Evaluation practices in flipped classroom and m-learning contexts

Evaluation practices in flipped classroom and m-learning contexts

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22458/ie.v23i34.3152

Keywords:

Assessment, Flipped classroom, Teaching method, M-Learning, Higher education

Abstract

In recent years, pedagogical models of the highest level have shown a great expansion towards blended learning (Ibáñez, de Benito Crosetti, Garcías, and Cervera, 2018; Mariño, 2007; Morán, 2012; Vera, 2008). These models allow for incorporating both the face-to-face and virtual environments in such a way that it allows the optimization of the most compelling qualities of each of them. Among the different ways of implementing blended learning is the flipped classroom (Coufal, 2014; Schneider, Suhr, Rolon, & Almeida, 2013), which has been continuously acquiring more relevance. In these contexts, teachers face the transformation of all their practices; among them, evaluation is a relevant axis that has been little addressed. Based on this problem, the research presented in this work addressed the evaluation carried out in three school subjects. The approach, strategies, and instruments were examined that one may establish the particularities of evaluation in these contexts. Through a qualitative approach, information was collected through interviews, observations, and documentary analysis. Likewise, a constant comparative method was adopted, and the categories that allowed characterizing evaluation in flipped classroom contexts we reconstructed. The decisions and actions regarding evaluation demonstrated how the pedagogical proposal and the didactic possibilities of the activities define the evaluation’s characteristics more than it does the qualities of the technological tools.

Author Biography

Lourdes Morán, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET)

Expertise: Teaching practices through online didactics. It focuses on the articulation between technology and education in university and pre-university settings.

Training: Doctor in Educational Sciences, Specialist in Educational Technology and Bachelor of Educational Sciences (University of Buenos Aires, Faculty of Philosophy and Letters)

Research activity: Researcher of the National Council for Scientific and Technical Research (CONICET). Research member of the Regional Center for Research in Humanities and Social Sciences. Faculty of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, Universidad Autónoma de Entre Ríos. (CRIHCS) Participates in various research projects and teams, in force: team of researchers from the Faculty of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences - UADER - Concepción del Uruguay Headquarters; Study Group on University Didactics and Digital Academic Profession in Latin America (DUPADAL) Faculty of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences - UADER - Concepción del Uruguay Headquarters. (CONICET / FHAyCS-UADER); National Agency for Scientific and Technological Research (AGENCIA, PICT Project) "Teaching practices of postgraduate thesis writing: comparative study of experiences in face-to-face and virtual environments"; UBA TIC Project 2018-2020 As a teacher at the UBA School of Dentistry, he participates in the UBA TIC Project called “LOOPING alternatives for teaching in Dentistry. Enriched virtual environments and environments with high technological disposition for the teaching of Dentistry at the UBA ”. The participation of these research groups give rise to numerous presentations at conferences and scientific research articles

Teaching activity at the higher level: Teacher of different university graduate careers. Some of them: "Postgraduate in hybrid and online digital teaching" (Faculty of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences - UADER - Concepción del Uruguay), Master in University Teaching (University of Buenos Aires). She develops teaching tasks in the Teaching Training Program of the Faculty of Dentistry of the University of Buenos Aires and performs pedagogical advisory tasks. As a pedagogical advisor, she is a member of the Dental Education and Pedagogical Assistance Area of ​​the Faculty of Dentistry.

She is dedicated to research and teacher training in the incorporation of digital technologies in higher education. As a researcher, she studies teaching practices in virtual training proposals. As a teacher, he trains and advises on didactic strategies and on the design of virtual training proposals at the higher level. Both performances allow approaching the field of study of teaching practices and virtuality with a broad perspective.

References

Coufal, K. (2014). Flipped learning instructional model: perceptions of video delivery to support engagement in eighth grade math. Lamar University-Beaumont.
de Camilloni, A., Davini, M. C., Edelstein, G., Litwin, E., Souto, M., & Barco, S. (1998). Corrientes didácticas contemporáneas. Paidós.
Frabboni, F. (1984). La scuola de base tempo lungo. Nápoles: Liguori.
Gardner, H. (2001). La inteligencia reformulada: las inteligencias múltiples en el siglo XXI Paidos
González-Pérez, L. I., Glasserman Morales, L. D., Ramírez-Montoya, M. S., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2017). Repositorios como soportes para diseminar experiencias de innovación educativa. Innovación Educativa. Investigación, formación, vinculación y visibilidad, 259-272.
Grund, F. B., & Gil, D. J. G. (2011). Mobile learning: Los dispositivos móviles como recurso educativo. Madrid
Hernández Sampieri, R., & Fernández Collado, C. (2014). Baptista Lucio Pilar. Metodología de la investigación. Sexta Edición, México.
Hernández Sampieri, R., & Fernández Collado, C. (2010). Baptista Lucio MdP. Metodología de la investigación, 6.
Ibáñez, J. S., de Benito Crosetti, B., Garcías, A. P., & Cervera, M. G. (2018). Blended learning, más allá de la clase presencial. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 21(1), 195-213.
Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30-43.
Litwin, E. (2008). El oficio de enseñar. Editorial Paidos.
Mariño, J. C. G. (2007). B-Learning utilizando software libre, una alternativa viable en educación superior. Ciencia UAT, 1(3), 60-66.
Méndez, J. M. Á. (1996). Yo también quiero ser eficaz. Cuadernos de pedagogía, (247), 78-82.
Morán, L. (2012). Blended-learning. Desafío y oportunidad para la educación actual. EDUTEC. Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, (39), a188-a188.
Morin, E. (2003). Educar en la era planetaria. Editorial Gedisa.
Perkins, D. (1999). The many faces of constructivism. Educational leadership, 57(3), 6-11.
Pozo, J. I., & Monereo, C. (2001). El aprendizaje estratégico. Docencia universitaria, 2(2), 105-109.
Pozo, J. I. (2009). Psicología del aprendizaje universitario. Ediciones Morata.
Rué, J. (2009). El aprendizaje autónomo en educación superior (Vol. 20). Narcea Ediciones.
Salomon, G., Perkins, D. N., & Globerson, T. (1992). Coparticipando en el conocimiento: la ampliación de la inteligencia humana con las tecnologías inteligentes. Comunicación, lenguaje y educación, 4(13), 6-22.
Santos Guerra, M. Á. (1993). La evaluación: un proceso de diálogo, comprensión y mejora. Revista Investigación en la Escuela, 20, 23-35.
Schneider, E. I., Suhr, I. R. F., Rolon, V. E., & Almeida, C. M. D. (2013). Sala de Aula Invertida em EAD: uma proposta de Blended Learning. Revista Intersaberes, 8(16), 68-81.
Stenhouse, L. (1984). Investigación y desarrollo del currículum. Ediciones Morata.
Talbert, R. (2012). Inverted classroom. Colleagues, 9(1), 7.
Valero, C. C., Redondo, M. R., & Palacín, A. S. (2012). Tendencias actuales en el uso de dispositivos móviles en educación. La educación digital magazine, 147, 1-21.
Vera, F. (2008). La modalidad blended-learning en la educación superior. Rancagua, Chile.

Published

2021-06-14

How to Cite

Morán, L. (2021). Evaluation practices in flipped classroom and m-learning contexts. Innovaciones Educativas, 23(34), 98–112. https://doi.org/10.22458/ie.v23i34.3152
Loading...