The Implementation of Effective Online Asynchronous Corrective Feedback on the Oral Production of English as a Foreign Language Learners in University Virtual Speaking Classes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22458/ie.v25i39.4580Keywords:
Feedback, Electronic Learning, Second Language Instruction, Oral Expression, University StudentsAbstract
This article had as main aim that of identifying the effectiveness of asynchronous corrective feedback on the oral production of university students taking an online integrated English course as part of their program. All research instruments and tested corrective feedback method were applied in the speaking section of the course that had a duration of sixteen weeks. The study followed a mixed-methods design, where qualitative data was gathered by means of a leaners’ speech analysis scale, while quantitative data was gathered through a questionnaire addressing language learners´ preferences in relation to corrective feedback in oral English classes. A first oral test and final oral test were also used as pre-test and post-test to measure the level of improvement after the intervention phase. Opposed to Nunan’s (1992) position towards the use of positive feedback instead of corrective feedback, the present research project was underlaid by the conception that teachers’ reactions and reflections on learners’ deviant forms of the target language are a crucial part of the whole language learning spectrum. Very interesting findings were shed, first, for the two main types of errors analyzed in the study (Grammar and Vocabulary, and Pronunciation), there was a diminution in quantity when comparing the results from the first exam to those of the final exam, representing those learners committed 10% less errors in the final oral exam. Unsurprisingly, students unanimously favored the use of corrective feedback in their language classes. However, preferences on synchronous and asynchronous corrective feedback showed no major difference.
References
Ananda, D., Febriyanti, E., Yamin, M. & Mu’in, F. (2017). Students’ Preferences toward Oral Corrective Feedback in Speaking Class at English Department of Lambung Mangkurat University Academic Year 2015/2016. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7(3), 176-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0703.03
Bower, J. (2011). Negotiation of Meaning and Corrective Feedback in Japanese/English eTANDEM. Language Learning & Technology, 15(1), 41–71. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ946175
Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. White Plains, NY: Longman.
Chin, G. (2008). Pedagogies Proving Krashen’s Theory of Affective Filter. Hwa Kang Journal of English Language & Literature, 14,113-131. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED503681.pdf
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge, U.K: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge
Darmawan, Dewi, A., Mashuri, & Setiana, S. (2020). Teaching Speaking with Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) Approach. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1-5. https://bit.ly/3nkgbMZ
Dashtestani, R. (2014). English as a Foreign Language Teachers’ Perspectives on Implementing Online Instruction in the Iranian EFL Context. Research in Learning Technology, 22, 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v22.20142
Dihoff, R., Brosvic, G., Epstein, M. & Cook, M. (2004). Provision of Feedback During Preparation for Academic Testing: Learning is Enhanced by Immediate but Not Delayed Feedback. The Psychological Record, 54, 207-231.
Ellis, R. (2002). The Methodology of Task-Based Teaching. Asian EFL Journal, 11(5), 6-23. http://bit.ly/42YbIjn
Ellis, R. (2013). Corrective feedback in teacher guides and SLA. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research 1(3), 1-18. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1127401.pdf
Ellis, R., Loewen, S. & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and Explicit Corrective Feedback and the Acquisition of L2 Grammar. SSLA, 28, 339–368. http://bit.ly/3MbPe8B
Ellis, R. & Sheen, Y. (2006). Reexamining the Role of Recasts in Second Language Acquisition. SSLA, 28, 575–600. http://bit.ly/430Vbv1
Faqeih, H. (2015). Learners’ Attitudes towards Corrective Feedback. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192. 664-671. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.101
Fanselow, J. (1977). The treatment of error in oral work. Foreign Language Annals, 10, 583–593. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1977.tb03035.x
González, D. (2017). Ambientes colaborativos virtuales para el aprendizaje individual. Actualidades Investigativas en Educación,17(2),1-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.15517/aie.v17i1.28092
González, P. (2016). The e-generation: the use of technology for foreign language learning. In A. Pareja, C. Calle & P. Rodríguez (Eds.), New perspectives on teaching and working with languages in the digital era. (pp. 51-61) http://dx.doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2016.tislid2014.9781908416353
Hoa, P. (2007). Communicative language teaching: Unity within Diversity. ELT Journal, 61(3), 193-201. https://bit.ly/3MjtTKi
Kabir, S. M. (2016). Methods of Data Collection. In S. M. Kabir (Ed.). Basic Guidelines for Research: An Introductory Approach for All Disciplines (201-275), Bangladesh: Book Zone Publication https://bit.ly/3Gdc5g6
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. New York: Prentice-Hall International. http://www.sdkrashen.com/content/books/principles_and_practice.pdf
Krashen, S. (1977). Some issues relating to the monitor model. In Brown, H; Yorio, Carlos; Crymes, Ruth (Eds.), Teaching and learning English as a Second Language: Trends in Research and Practice: On TESOL '77: Selected Papers from the Eleventh Annual Convention of Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages. (pp. 144–158). https://eric.ed.gov/?q=discourse+analysis&pg=1587&id=ED187115
Lee, A. & Lyster, R. (2023). The effects of different types of form-focused instruction on the acquisition of grammatical gender by second language learners of French. Language Awareness, 32(1) 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2022.2149762
Lizcano, A., Barboza, J. & Villamizar, J. (2017). Aprendizaje colaborativo con apoyo en TIC: concepto, metodología y recursos. Revista Internacional de Investigación en Educación, 12 (24), 5-24. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.m12-24.acat
Lyster, R. (1998). Negotiation of Form, Recasts, and Explicit Correction in Relation to Error Types and Learner Repair in Immersion Classrooms. Language Learning, 48(2), 183-218. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00039
Lyster, R. & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Negotiation of Form in Communicative Classrooms. SSLA, 20, 37–66. https://bit.ly/3Ku18cw
MacDonald, P., García, A. & Carot, J. (2013). Computer Learner Corpora: Analysing Interlanguage Errors in Synchronous and Asynchronous Communication. Language Learning & Technology, June 2013, 17(2). 36–56. http://llt.msu.edu/issues/june2013/macdonaldetal.pdf
Mousavi, K. & Gorjian, B. (2018). Using Error Correction in Teaching Oral Production to Iranian EFL Learners. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Learning, 4(2),21-29. http://article.sapub.org/10.5923.j.jalll.20180402.01.html
Nunan, D. (1992). Research Methods in Language Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://bit.ly/3K7m0VB
Quinn, P. (2014). Delayed versus immediate corrective feedback on orally produced passive errors in English. [Doctoral thesis, University of Toronto]. https://hdl.handle.net/1807/65728
Richards, J. (2006). Communicative Language Teaching Today. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://www.professorjackrichards.com/wp-content/uploads/Richards-Communicative-Language.pdf
Richards, J. & Schmidt, R. (2002). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. Harlow, England: Pearson. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315833835
Saptura, J. & Wargianto (2015). Communicative Language Teaching: Changing Students’ Speaking Skill. Premise Journal, 4(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.24127/pj.v4i1.277
Shabani, K. & Safari, F. (2016). Immediate vs Delayed Correction Feedback (CF) and Accuracy of Oral Production: The Role of Anxiety. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(11), 2222-2230. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0611.21
Sheen, Y. & Ellis, R. (2011). Corrective Feedback in Language Teaching. In Hinkel, E. (Eds.), Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning (pp. 593-610). Routledge. http//10.4324/9780203836507.ch36
Samburskiy, D. & Quah, J. (2014). Corrective Feedback in Asynchronous Online Interaction: Developing Novice Online Language Instructors. CALICO Journal, 31(2), 158-178. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/calicojournal.31.2.158.pdf
Savignon, S. J. 2002. Communicative Curriculum Design for the 21st Century. English Teaching Forum, 2–7. https://americanenglish.state.gov/files/ae/resource_files/02-40-1-c.pdf
Saza, I. (2016). Estrategias Didácticas en Tecnologías Web para Ambienes Virtuales de Aprendizaje. Praxis, 12, 103-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.21676/23897856.1851
Shanthi, A., Wah, L. & Lajium, D. (2015). Discourse Analysis as a Qualitative Approach to Study Information Sharing Practice in Malaysian Board Forums. International Journal on E-Learning Practices (IJELP), 2, 159-169. https://bit.ly/3U3dFqA
Touchie, H. (1986). Second Language Learning Errors Their Types, Causes, and Treatment. JALT Journal, 8, 75-80. http://bit.ly/3nLRetS
Vega, S., Pulido, M. & Ruiz, N. (2017). Teaching English as a Second Language at a University in Colombia That Uses Virtual Environments: A Case Study. Revista Electrónica Educare, 21(3), 1-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.15359/ree.21-3.9
Vinagre, M. & Muñoz, B. (2011). Computer-Mediated Corrective Feedback and Language Accuracy in Telecollaborative Exchanges. Language Learning & Technology,15(1), 72–103. http://llt.msu.edu/issues/february2011/vinagremunoz.pdf
Warschauer, M. (2001). Online communication. In R. Carter & D. Nunan (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages (pp. 207-212). Cambridge University Press. http://education.uci.edu/uploads/7/2/7/6/72769947/online_communication.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Innovaciones Educativas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.