Revisión sistemática de las características de evaluación curricular en programas académicos de pregrado a través del método PRISMA-NMA

Revisión sistemática de las características de evaluación curricular en programas académicos de pregrado a través del método PRISMA-NMA

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22458/caes.v13i2.4415

Palabras clave:

Evaluación, Modelo, Evaluación Curricular, Evaluación Institucional, Evaluación de Programas

Resumen

Las prácticas de evaluación curricular en la educación superior son indispensables, dados los procesos de autoevaluación y autorregulación exigidos por las secretarías y ministerios de educación de cada país. Por lo tanto, este estudio tiene como objetivo identificar las características de las prácticas de evaluación curricular en programas de educación superior, por medio un análisis documental que incorpora el flujograma del método PRISMA-NMA. Los resultados obtenidos demuestran que en la mayoría de los estudios no se contó con modelos de evaluación curricular, sino que se basaron en el desarrollo de metodologías fundamentadas en los paradigmas cualitativo y cuantitativo, de igual manera, se identificaron las características y los elementos necesarios para el desarrollo de un proceso de evaluación curricular.

Biografía del autor/a

Mónica. Viviana Cely-Salazar, Universidad Internacional Iberoamericana

Universidad Internacional Iberoamericana.

ps.monicacely@gmail.com

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1695-7950

 

Abel Quiñones-Urquijo, Universidad Internacional Iberoamericana

Doctor en educación y Doctor en Pedagogia.

Universidad Internacional Iberoamericana.

abel.quinones@unini.edu.mx 

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0819-778X

 

 

 

 

Citas

Al-Htaybat, K., von Alberti-Alhtaybat, L., & Alhatabat, Z. (2018). Educating digital natives for the future: accounting educators’ evaluation of the accounting curriculum. Accounting Education, 27(4), 333–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2018.1437758

Al-Jardani, K. S., Siraj, S., & Abedalaziz, N. (2012). Developing a framework for curriculum evalution in Oman. English Linguistics Research, 1(2), 1-6.

Andrian, D., Kartowagiran, B., & Hadi, S. (2018). The instrument development to evaluate local curriculum in Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 921-934.

Arafeh, S. (2016). Curriculum mapping in higher education: a case study and proposed content scope and sequence mapping tool. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 40(5), 585-611. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2014.1000278

Aslan, M., & Saglam, M. (2017). Methodological investigation of the curriculum evaluation theses completed between the Years 2006-2015 in Turkey. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(9), 1468-1478.

Aydin, B., Unver, M. M., Alan, B., & Saglam, S. (2017). Combining the old and the new: designing a curriculum based on the taba model and the global scale of English. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 13(1), 304-320.

Aygören, F., & Er, K. O. (2019). New approach at evaluating the private schools’ curriculum: I-CODE Model. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 18(2), 58-81.

Begoña, M., Maximiliano, M., Cuellar, J., Domancic, S., & Villanueva, J. (2018). Revisiones sistemáticas: definición y nociones básicas. Revista Clínica Periodoncia e Implantología, 11(3), 184-186. https://doi.org/10.406/S0719-01072018000300184

Berger, E. R., Kreutzer, L., Halverson, A., Yang, A. D., Reinhart, S., Leary, K. J. O., Williams, M. V., Bilimoria, K. Y., & Johnson, J. K. (2020). Evaluation of Changes in Quality Improvement Knowledge Following a Formal Educational Curriculum Within a Statewide Learning Collaborative. Journal of Surgical Education, 77(6), 1534-1541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.04.018

Bonilla-Calero, A. I., Carabantes-Alarcón, D., & Sastre-Castillo, M. Á. (2020). International Accreditation in Medical Education through WFME. Educación Médica, 20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2020.06.006

Bridgman, C., Suszko, A., Russell, D., Sampson, K. A., Moltchanova, E., & Robertson, I. (2017). A Roadmap for the Evaluation of Attributes in University Graduates. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 53(1), 119-134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-017-0102-3

Casanova, M. A. (2012). El diseño curricular como factor de calidad educativa. REICE. Revista Iberoamericana Sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio En Educación, 10(4), 6-20. https://doi.org/10.14718/RevArq.2013.15.1.9

Castañeda, L., & Prendes, P. (2013). A curriculum development route map for a technology enhanced learning era. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 1(3), 209-220.

Dawson, S., & Hubball, H. (2014). Curriculum analytics: application of social network analysis for improving strategic curriculum decision-making in a research-intensive university. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 2(2), 59-74.

García-Padilla, F. M., Sosa-Cordobés, E., Travé-González, G. H., & Simôes-Figueiredo, A. (2019). Innovation and research on the Community Nursing curriculum: Literature review. Educacion Medica, 20(2), 105-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2018.07.002

Goldman, E. F., & Mintz, M. L. (2017). Using Concepts from Complexity Science to Accelerate Curricular Revision. Innovative Higher Education, 42(5-6), 437-449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-017-9396-9

Gottipati, S., & Shankararaman, V. (2018). Competency analytics tool: Analyzing curriculum using course competencies. Education and Information Technologies, 23(1), 41-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9584-3

Hadi, S., Andrian, D., & Kartowagiran, B. (2019). Evaluation model for evaluating vocational skills programs on local content curriculum in Indonesia: Impact of educational system in Indonesia. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 2019(82), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2019.82.3

Hutton, B., Catalá-López, F., & Moher, D. (2016). La extensión de la declaración PRISMA para revisiones sistemáticas que incorporan metaanálisis en red: PRISMA-NMA. Medicina Clínica, 20, 10-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2016.02.025

Jones, A. C., Shipman, S. A., & Ogrinc, G. (2015). Key characteristics of successful quality improvement curricula in physician education: A realist review. BMJ Quality and Safety, 24(1), 77-88. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2014-002846

Kavgaoglu, D., & Alci, B. (2016). Application of context input process and product model in curriculum evaluation: case study of a call centre. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(17), 1659-1669.

Kelly, S., & Abruzzo, E. (2020). Using Lesson-Specific Teacher Reports of Student Engagement to Investigate Innovations in Curriculum and Instruction. Educational Researcher. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20982255

Khanna, P., Roberts, C., & Lane, A. S. (2021). Designing health professional education curricula using systems thinking perspectives. BMC Medical Education, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02442-5

Liao, H., & Li, L. (2017). A Mixed Methods Evaluation of College English Writing: A Case Study in China. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 26(6), 383-396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-017-0357-y

Lippe, M., & Carter, P. (2018). Using the CIPP Model to Assess Nursing Education Program Quality and Merit. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 13(1), 9-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2017.09.008

Loushine, T. W., & Feyen, R. G. (2013). Using professional certification criteria to assess occupational safety curricula in degree programs investigating accreditation. Higher Learning Research Communications, 3(2), 32-52.

Madaus, G., & Kellaghan, T. (2002). Models, metaphors, and definitions in evaluation. En D. L. Stufflebeam, G. F. Madaus, & T. Kellaghan (Eds.), Evaluation Models, 49, pp. 19-41. Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47559-6

Mcdavid, J. C., & Huse, I. (2015). How does accreditation fit into the picture? New Directions for Evaluation, 2015(145), 53-69. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20111

Méndez, G., Ochoa, X., Chiluiza, K., & de Wever, B. (2014). Curricular design analysis: A data-driven perspective. Journal of Learning Analytics, 1(3), 84-119.

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(10), 1006-1012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005

Morbitzer, K. A., McLaughlin, J. E., Ozawa, S., Beechinor, R., Dumond, J., Pomykal, C., Bush, A., Zhang, Q., Carpenter, D., & Lee, C. R. (2021). Implementation and initial evaluation of a research and scholarship training pathway in a doctor of pharmacy curriculum. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 85(1), 55-66. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe8079

Pigott, T. D., & Polanin, J. R. (2020). Methodological Guidance Paper: High-Quality Meta-Analysis in a Systematic Review. Review of Educational Research, 90(1), 24-46. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319877153

Prendes, M. P., Castañeda, L., & Gutiérrez, I. (2010). ICT competences of future teachers. Comunicar, 17(35), 175-181. https://doi.org/10.3916/C35-2010-03-11

Raycroft, M. A. R., & Flynn, A. B. (2020). What works? What’s missing? An evaluation model for science curricula that analyses learning outcomes through five lenses. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(4), 1110-1131. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9rp00157c

Ross, S. J., Sen Gupta, T., & Johnson, P. (2021). Leadership curricula and assessment in Australian and New Zealand medical schools. BMC Medical Education, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02456-z

Sawaya, R. D., Mrad, S., Rajha, E., Saleh, R., & Rice, J. (2021). Simulation-based curriculum development: lessons learnt in Global Health education. BMC Medical Education, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02430-9

Scriven, M. (2002). Evaluation Ideologies. In D. L. Stufflebeam, G. F. Madaus, & T. Kellaghan (Eds.), Evaluation Models, (49), pp. 248-278. Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47559-6

Sinaga, A. M., Nie, C., Leung, H., Lou, Y., Ghanbari, A., Li, X., Zhang, L. L., Hao, D., Zhang, L. L., Singh, Y., Kaur, A., Suri, B., Singhal, S., Wang, X. Z., He, Y. C. Y. P., Fraser, G., Zeller, A., Spieker, H., Gotlieb, A., … Woo, M. (2019). Evaluación del aprendizaje en la educación a distancia en línea. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 24(4), 233-244. https://doi.org/10.1145/1390630.1390641

Stake, R. (2002). Program Evaluation, Particularly Responsive Evaluation. In D. L. Stufflebeam, G. F. Madaus, & T. Kellaghan (Eds.), Evaluation Models, (49), pp. 343-363. Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47559-6

Strauss, & Corbin. (2002). Bases de la investigación cualitativa: Técnicas y procedimientos para desarrollar la teoría fundamentada. Editorial Universidad de Antioquia. http://www.academia.edu/download/38537364/Teoria_Fundamentada.pdf

Stufflebeam, D. (2016). Factors that influenced my conduct of evaluations and evaluation training programs. In Seven north american evaluation pioneers (Issue 150, pp. 13-15). American Evaluation Association. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev

Suyanti, I. (2019). The evaluation of curriculum 2013 implementation of class i and iv at sd Kecamatan air Kumbang. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(4), 293-299.

Tyler, R. W. (2000). A rationale for program evaluation. In Evaluation in Education and Human Services (pp. 85–120). Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Descargas

Publicado

2022-11-30

Cómo citar

Cely-Salazar, M. V., & Quiñones-Urquijo, A. (2022). Revisión sistemática de las características de evaluación curricular en programas académicos de pregrado a través del método PRISMA-NMA. Revista Electrónica Calidad En La Educación Superior, 13(2), 150–174. https://doi.org/10.22458/caes.v13i2.4415

Número

Sección

Artículos
Loading...