Role of gender, professional level, and geographic location of artists on how they represent a story: the case of Little Red Riding Hood
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22458/urj.v9i2.1896Keywords:
artistic interpretation, cultural differences, effect of gender on art, fairy tale representationAbstract
Little Red Riding Hood is a widely known classic story and its text has been abundantly analyzed, but no detailed statistical stud- ies have been published about how it has been illustrated. We analyzed 554 images from the public artists’ site DeviantArt (January, 2015); clas- si ed them according to how the wolf, Little Red, and the environment were represented by the artists; and applied non-parametrical statisti- cal tests to check several hypotheses. When compared with profession- als, amateur artists tended to present a more neutral environment, and to humanize the wolf. Female artists were more likely to represent the wolf as a dressed man. Men were more likely to set the story outside of forests, to eroticize Red and to show her confused, scared or unin- terested when rst meeting the wolf. The neutral attitude of amateurs towards nature suggests indecision, while professional artists seem more used to produce family-friendly images. The female tendency to present the wolf as a man forces them to dress him and may re ect a stronger awareness about the moral of the story, meant to warn young women about men’s sexuality. Men deviate more from the forest set- ting because they feel safer in new environments, and also appear to see Red as a sexually attractive partner and the wolf as a competitor. Artists tended to show no sexual intent between the characters, but those who did were mostly amateurs. The global similarity in art about Little Red Riding Hood indicates that all modern audiences are familiar with the standard representation of the story in books, lms and televi- sion. This article presents a rigorous quantitative approach to the study of art that can be applied to many other stories and subjects.
References
Beckett, S. L. (2002). Recycling Red Riding Hood. NY: Routledge.
Berrington, E., & Jones, H. (2002). Reality vs. myth: Constructions of women’s insecurity. Feminist Media Studies, 2(3), 307- 323. doi: 10.1080/1468077022000034817
Blecourt, W. de (2012). Tales of magic, tales in print. On the genea- logy of fairy tales and the Brothers Grimm. Manchester U.
Bonner, S. (2006). “Visualizing Little Red Riding Hood.” Moveable Type: Journal of the Graduate Society. Department of English, University College London. Retrieved from https://www.ucl.ac.uk/moveable-type/pdfs/ 2005-6/Bonner
Bradmetz, J., & Schneider, R. (1999). Is Little Red Riding Hood afraid of her grandmother? Cognitive vs. emotional esponse to a false belief. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17, 501-514. doi: 10.1348/026151099165438
Choi, H., Yoo, K., Reichert, T., & LaTour, M. S. (2016). Do feminists still respond negatively to female nudity in adverti- sing? Investigating the infuence of feminist attitudes on reactions to sexual appeals. International Journal of Advertising, 35(5), 823-845
Dundes, Alan.(1989). Little Red Riding Hood; A Casebook. University of Wisconsin.
Fazio, L. K., Brashier, N. M., Payne, B. K., & Marsh, E. J. (2015). Knowledge does not protect against illusory truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(5), 993. doi: 10.1037/xge0000098
Hanks, C., & Hanks Jr, D. T. (1978). Perrault’s “Little Red Riding Hood”: Victim of the Revisers. Children’s Literature, 7(1), 68-77. doi: 10.1353/chl.0.0528
Jones, S. S. (1987). On Analyzing Fairy Tales: “Little Red Riding Hood” Revisited. Western Folklore, 46(2), 97-106. doi: 10.2307/1499927
Mendoza, J., & D. Reese. (2001). Examining Multicultural Picture Books for the Early Childhood Classroom: Possibilities and Pitfalls. Early Childhood Research and Practice, 3 (2), n2. Retrieved from http://ecrp.uiuc.edu/v3n2/ mendoza.html
Monge-Nájera, J. (2016). Ann ́s secret relationship with King Kong: a biological look at Skull Island and the true na- ture of the Beauty and the Beast Myth. CoRis, 12, 13-28.
Müller, M., & Job, H. (2009). Managing natural disturbance in protected areas: tourists’ attitude towards the bark beet- le in a German national park. Biological Conservation, 142(2), 375-383. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.10.037
Perrault, C. (1697). Les Contes de ma Mère l’Oye, Paris: Barbin.
Robinson, L. A. & Wildermuth, S. M. (2016). “It’s All About the Dress!”: An Examination of 150 Years of Cinderella Picture Book Covers. The Popular Culture Studies Journal, 4(1 -2), 4-40.
Sartori, A., Yanulevskaya, V., Salah, A. A., Uijlings, J., Bruni, E., & Sebe, N. (2015). A ective analysis of professional and amateur abstract paintings using statistical analysis and art theory. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent
Systems (TiiS), 5(2), 8. doi: 10.1145/2768209
Sterck, M. De. (2014). El despertar de la belleza. Sesenta cuentos populares de los cinco continentes. Madrid: Siruela.
Tehrani, J. J. (2013). The phylogeny of little red riding hood. PloS one, 8(11), e78871. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078871
Vekić, T. (2009). (Re)escrituras de Caperucita Roja en la literatura hispánica de la segunda mitad del siglo XX que desafían normas sociales coercitivas.
Vancouver: University of British Columbia, M. Ars Thesis.
Zipes, J. (1983). The Trials and Tribulations of Little Red Riding Hood. South Handley, Mass.: Bergin & Garvey.
Zipes, J. (1993). A Second Gaze at Little Red Riding Hood’s Trials and Tribulations.”In Don’t Bet on the Prince: Contemporary Feminist Fairy Tales in
North America & England, Ed. Jack Zipes. England: Scholar, 227-260. https://muse.jhu.edu/ article/243762
Zipes, J. (2012). Fairy-Tale Collisions, or the Explosion of a GenreIn The Irresistible Fairy Tale: The Cultural and Social History of a Genre.Princeton University.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Note: This abstract contains an incorrect copyright due to technical issues. Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
All journal contents are freely available through a CC BY 4.0 license.
CC BY 4.0 is a Creative Commons: you can copy, modify, distribute, and perform, even for commercial reasons, without asking permission, if you give appropriate credit.
Contents can be reproduced if the source and copyright are acknowledged according to the Open Access license CC BY 4.0. Self-storage in preprint servers and repositories is allowed for all versions. We encourage authors to publish raw data and data logs in public repositories and to include the links with all drafts so that reviewers and readers can consult them at any time.
The journal is financed by public funds via Universidad Estatal a Distancia and editorial independence and ethical compliance are guaranteed by the Board of Editors, UNED. We do not publish paid ads or receive funds from companies.