New Terrestrial Vertebrate Species Reported for Costa Rica in the Last 10 Years. 2013 to 2024 period
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22458/rb.v36i1.5920Keywords:
biological diversity, species data, taxonomic groups, geographical distribution, information gapsAbstract
Costa Rica has been characterized for periodically presenting species diversity data. However, there is still a need to gather information that facilitates the understanding and analysis of biodiversity to enhance its conservation and management. This Article presents a compilation of newly reported terrestrial vertebrate species, specifically focusing on amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals, between 2013 and October 2024. An extensive bibliographic review was conducted using various sources, including lists of species generated by the Project on Biodiversity in Numbers of the National University of Costa Rica. Among the most relevant findings, there are 78 new species of terrestrial vertebrates classified into 38 families and 60 genera. Of these, 47 records represent range extensions (35 birds, three amphibians, two snakes, and seven mammals), 25 are new species to science (one bird, 15 amphibians, five reptiles, and four mammals), two introduced amphibian species, and the separation of three species was confirmed through morphological and molecular analyses. In terms of distribution, coastal areas such as Puntarenas and Limon show the most records. The specific sites with the newest species are within or very close to Protected Wildlife Areas, such as Coco Island, Tortuguero, and Corcovado.
References
Aguiar, L. M. S., Pereira, M. J. R., Zortéa, M., & Machado, R. B. (2020). Where are the bats? An environmental complementarity analysis in a megadiverse country. Diversity and Distributions, 26(11), 1510–1522. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13137
Arias, S., & Montoya, M. (2023). Observaciones ornitológicas en la Isla del Coco y sus aguas oceánicas, Costa Rica (julio y setiembre, 2020). Biocenosis, 34(1), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.22458/rb.v34i1.4826
Avalos, G. (2018). Still searching the rich coast: Biodiversity of Costa Rica, numbers, processes, patterns, and challenges. En T. Pullaiah (Ed.), Global Biodiversity, Volume 4, Selected countries in the Americas and Australia. Apple Academic Press. https://fieldstudies.org/about/team/gerardo-avalos/
BIODATACR. (2022). Plataforma informática para la gestión del conocimiento y la información nacional sobre biodiversidad. Recuperado de http://biodiversidad.go.cr/
Beaumont, L. J., Hughes, L., & Pitman, A. J. (2008). Why is the choice of future climate scenarios for species distribution modelling important? Ecology Letters, 11(11), 1135–1146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01231.x
Bermúdez-Rojas, T., & Obando-Acuña, V. (2021). Biodiversidad en cifras: avances en el conocimiento de especies en Costa Rica. Biocenosis, 32(2), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.22458/rb.v32i2.3899
Clark, K. B. (2011). Fragmentation effects on vegetation and resulting vertebrate species distributions in the Sonoran Desert. Journal of the Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science, 42(2), 84–91. https://doi.org/10.2181/036.042.0204
Gámez, R., Obando, V., & Zamora, N. (2024). EXPERIENCIAS: El INBio: su labor innovadora en el conocimiento y el uso sostenible de la biodiversidad en Costa Rica. Revista de Ciencias Ambientales (Trop J Environ Sci), 58(2), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.15359/rca.58-2.7
Hending, D. (2024). Cryptic species conservation: a review. Biological Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.13139
Hughes, A. C., Orr, M. C., Ma, K., Costello, M. J., Waller, J., Provoost, P., Yang, Q., Zhu, C., & Qiao, H. (2021). Sampling biases shape our view of the natural world. Ecography, 44(9), 1259–1269. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.05926
Kubicki, B., Reyes, A., & Arias, E. (2022). Revised taxonomy and distributions of Costa Rican moss salamanders (Caudata: Plethodontidae: Nototriton), with descriptions of new taxa. Zootaxa, 5194, 451–496. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5194.4.1
Leenders, T. (2016). Amphibians of Costa Rica: A field guide. Comstock Publishing Associates.
Leenders, T. (2023). Pocket guide to the amphibians and reptiles of Costa Rica. Comstock Publishing Associates. https://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/twan-leenders-pocket-guide-amphibians-and-reptiles-of-costa-rica-blog-04-27-2023/
Ministerio de Recursos Naturales, Energía y Minas (MIRENEM), Museo Nacional, Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad (INBio). (1992). Estudio Nacional de Biodiversidad. Costos, beneficios y necesidades de financiamiento de la conservación de la diversidad biológica en Costa Rica. PNUMA, Gobierno de Canadá.
Obando, V. (2002). Biodiversidad en Costa Rica. Estado del conocimiento y gestión. MINAE-INBio. Editorial INBio.
Obando, V. (2007). Biodiversidad de Costa Rica en cifras. MINAE-SINAC-INBio. Editorial INBio.
R Core Team. (2024). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org
RStudio Team. (2024). RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. RStudio, PBC. http://www.rstudio.com
Ramírez-Fernández, J. D., Sánchez, R., May-Collado, L. J., González-Maya, J. F., & Rodríguez-Herrera, B. (2023). Revised checklist and conservation status of the mammals of Costa Rica. THERYA, 14(2), 233–244. https://doi.org/10.12933/therya-23-2142
Svenning, J. C., Gravel, D., Holt, R. D., Schurr, F., Thuiller, W., Münkemüller, T., Schiffers, K. H., Dullinger, S., Edwards, T. C., Hickler, T., Higgins, S. I., Nabel, J. E. M., Pagel, J., & Normand, S. (2014). The influence of interspecific interactions on species range expansion rates. Ecography, 37(12), 1198–1209. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00574.x
Werthman, I., & Cortés, J. (2009). Marine biodiversity of Costa Rica, Central America (Monographiae Biologicae, Vol. 86). Springer.
Wiens, J. J., & Graham, C. H. (2005). Niche conservatism: Integrating evolution, ecology, and conservation biology. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 36(1), 519–539. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102803.095431
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

