Methodology for the evaluation of graduation attributes: case of the School of Civil Engineering, University of Costa Rica

Methodology for the evaluation of graduation attributes: case of the School of Civil Engineering, University of Costa Rica

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22458/caes.v14i2.4325

Keywords:

Accreditation, Civil Engineering, Higher education, Education program evaluation

Abstract

The measurement of graduation attributes is a common evaluation criterion of the accrediting agencies of engineering programs. This work evaluates the experience of the School of Civil Engineering, University of Costa Rica, in order to synthesize the pilot evaluation methodology created that measures three graduation attributes: basic knowledge, research and use of engineering tools. The suitability of the use of rubrics as an evaluation instrument is assessed, through a quantitative approach. The sample was 347 students during 2017. The results showed that the rubrics require work to prepare and apply, and may not be the most suitable option to evaluating hard attributes. The methodology has great replication potential, although limitations were identified to standardize it to other attributes.

Author Biographies

Nidia Cruz-Zúñiga, Universidad de Costa Rica

Profesora asociada Escuela de Ingeniería Civil, Universidad de Costa Rica.  Magister en Medio Ambiente (USACH). Master en Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Desarrollo (UCR)

Erick Centeno-Mora, Universidad de Costa Rica

Erick Centeno Mora es profesor de la Escuela de Ingeniería Civil de la Universidad de Costa Rica (UCR). Es MSc. en Ingeniería Ambiental de la Universidad AgroParisTech (Francia).

References

AAPIA. (2018). Evaluación de la introducción del enfoque por atributos en los planes de estudio de ingeniería, según el modelo de la Agencia de Acreditación del CFIA (AAPIA). http://aapia.cfia.or.cr/evaluacion-de-la-introduccion-del-enfoque-por-atributos-en-los-planes-de-estudio-de-ingenieria-segun-el-modelo-de-la-agencia-de-acreditacion-del-cfia-aapia/

ABET. (2019). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2019 – 2020. https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2019-2020/#GC3

Ayadat, Tahar, Ahmed, Danish, Chowdhury, Saidur, y Asiz, Andi. (2020). Measurable performance indicators of student learning outcomes: A case study. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 22(1), 40–50.

Báez, Mario, Guzmán, Luis, Mella, Elia, Solar, María Inés, Poblete, Álvaro, Vergara, Carolina, Zúñiga, María, Alvarado Virginia, Cárcamo Anahí, y Cazenave, Mario (2004). Evaluación de competencias de egresados universitarios en el área de educación. En GOP CINDA (Ed), Competencias de Egresados Universitarios (pp. 71-73). Santiago. CINDA.

Barrie, Simon (2006). Understanding what we mean by the generic attributes of graduates. Higher Education, 51(2), 215–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6384-7

Barrie, Simon (2007). A conceptual framework for the teaching and learning of generic graduate attributes. Studies in Higher Education, 32 (4), 439–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070701476100

Beneitone, Pablo, Esquetini, César, González, Julia, Marty, Maida, Siufi, Gabriela, y Wagenaar, Robert (Eds.). (2007). Informe Final Proyecto Tuning - América Latina: reflexiones y perspectivas de la Educación Superior en América Latina 2004-2007. Bilbao: Universidad Deusto (Vol. 7+). Bilbao: Universidad de Deusto.

Biggs, John y Tang, Catherine. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (Vol. 2011).

Bloom, Benjamin (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. New York: D. McKay.

Bolaños Cubero, Carolina, Cedeño Suárez, María Agustina, Rodríguez Guerrero, Ulises, y Umaña Mata, Ana Cristina (2015). Discusión conceptual y sistematización de experiencias para el diseño curricular por competencias, proyecto piloto innovación docente: formación por competencias. San José, C.R.: CONARE, OPES.

Bowden, John (2004). Capabilities-driven curriculum design. En: Baillie, Caroline y More, Ivan (Eds.), Effective Learning and Teaching in Engineering (pp. 36–47). London: Routledge.

CEAB. (2015). A Guide to Outcomes-based Criteria. Revisado el 27 de junio de 2021, de: http://ehea.info/Upload/document/ministerial_declarations/1999_Bologna_Declaration_English_553028.pdf

Comisión Europea. (1999). Declaración de Bolonia. Bolonia: The European Higher Education Area. https://www.engineerscanada.ca/sites/default/files/draft_program_visitor_guide_v1.25.pdf

Cruz, Nidia (2017). Medición de atributos de egreso como herramienta de mejora educativa: el caso de la Licenciatura en Ingeniería Civil de la Universidad de Costa Rica. Pensamiento Educativo: Revista de Investigación Educacional Latinoamericana, 54(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.7764/pel.54.2.2017.6

Desha, Cheryl, y Hargroves, Karlson (2014). Higher Education and Sustainable Development: a model for curriculum renewal. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.5840/thought1939141169

Dew, Steven, Lavoie, Mathieu, y Snelgrove, Ashley (2011). An Engineering Accreditation Management System. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA), 2–7. https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.v0i0.3577

Easa, Said (2013). Framework and guidelines for graduate attribute assessment in engineering education. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 40(6), 547–556. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2012-0485

Espericueta, Dora Erika, Ramírez, Arturo, Colunga, Juan Carlos, y Lara, Paula Marisol (2019). Propuesta para la evaluación de atributos del egresado, utilizando nuevas estrategias de enseñanza-aprendizaje. Revista Electronica Anfei Digital, 11, 1–10.

Felder, Richard, y Brent, Rebecca. (2016). Teaching and Learning STEM Resource: a Practical Guide. San Francisco, Estados Unidos: Jossey-Bass.

Henri, Maria, Johnson, Michael, y Nepal, Bimal. (2017). A Review of Competency-Based Learning: Tools, Assessments, and Recommendations. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(4), 607–638. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20180

Heywood, John (2005). Engineering education. Research and Development in Curriculum and Instruction. New Jersey: Wiley-Interscience. https://doi.org/10.4271/560201

Heywood, John (2016). The assessment of learning in engineering education. Practice and Policy. Dublin: Wiley.

International Engineering Alliance. (2014). 25 years of the Washington Accord. Nueva Zelanda. http://www.ieagreements.org/assets/Uploads/Documents/History/25YearsWashingtonAccord-A5booklet-FINAL.pdf

Isaacson, Michael (2016). Graduate attributes and accreditation. Canadian Civil Engineer, Spring 2016,19–21,

Meza, Eva Cristina, Aguilar, José Fabián, Quesada, Martha Isabel y Delgado, William (2017). Atributos de egreso en carreras de ingeniería. Cartago, Costa Rica: Tecnológica de Costa Rica.

Owens, Demian (2016). Outcome-based Education and Engineering Education Accreditation. CAST Innovation and Integration Engineering Education Accreditation International Symposium, Beijing, ppp 1–8.

Penzenstadler, Birgit, Schlosser, Tobias, Haller, Gabriele, y Frenzel, Gabriele (2009). Soft skills Required: A practical approach for empowering soft skills in the engineering world. 2009 Collaboration and Intercultural Issues on Requirements: Communication, Understanding and Softskills, CIRCUS 2009, 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1109/CIRCUS.2009.5

Riquelme, Paula, Ugüeño, Novoa, Del Valle, Rodrigo, Jara, Enriqueta y Del Pino, Miguel. (2017). Desafíos para la evaluación del perfil de egreso, aproximaciones conceptuales. en libro: evaluación del logro de perfiles de egreso: experiencias universitarias (pp.19-37).

San Martín, María Elena, Trumper, Rosa Eugenia, Pérez, Carlos, Blackhouse, Peter, Bañados, Claudia, Herrera, José Antonio y Ponce, Mauricio (2004). Evaluación de resultados de aprendizaje asociados a un perfil de egreso en ingeniería. De: Ayarza, Hernán y González, Luis Eduardo (Eds.), Competencias de egresados universitarios (1a ed.). Santiago de Chile: Centro Interuniversitario de Desarrollo (CINDA).

Shaeiwitz, Joseph. (1996). Outcomes Assessment in Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education, 85(3), 239–246. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.1996.tb00239.x

Sundararajan, Sriram. (2014). A strategy for sustainable student outcomes assessment for a mechanical engineering program that maximizes faculty engagement. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--20002

Universidad de Costa Rica (2015). Diseño Curricular Universitario, Orientaciones para los procesos de diseño curricular. Centro de Evaluación Académica, Universidad de Costa Rica.

Villardón, Lourdes (2006). Evaluación del aprendizaje para promover el desarrollo de competencias. Educativo siglo XXI, (24), 57-76.

Wankat, Phillip C. y Oreovicz, Frank (2016). Teaching engineering (2da ed.). Purdue University Press. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2009.2039956

Published

2023-11-30

How to Cite

Cruz-Zúñiga, N., & Centeno-Mora, E. (2023). Methodology for the evaluation of graduation attributes: case of the School of Civil Engineering, University of Costa Rica. Revista Electrónica Calidad En La Educación Superior, 14(2), 391–433. https://doi.org/10.22458/caes.v14i2.4325
Loading...