Gender and levels of adherence to antihypertensive treatment in personnel of the Costa Rican Distance Education University
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22458/urj.v1i2.226Keywords:
Hypertension, antihypertensive treatment, epidemiology, mortality, gender, cardiovascular riskAbstract
Gender and levels of adherence to antihypertensive treatment in personnel of the Costa Rican Distance Education University. Among chronic diseases, hypertension is one of the top causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Until now, health efforts have focused on decreasing this condition but the treatments have been ineffective and costly, and hypertension is one the least controlled diseases. Several studies have found that adherence to treatment in chronic diseases define therapeutic success. In turn, adherence depends on several factors from both the patients and their environment, but the relationship with the physician seems to be the main factor. In this context, gender is also an important factor in how patients deal with their disease. For this study, we interviewed 39 women and 41 men with hypertension who visited the health department at the Costa Rican Distance Education University, UNED, between January 14th, 2002 and December 15th, 2008. We wanted to see if there were gender differences in their relationship with the physician and their adherence to treatment. Statistical analysis found no significant gender differences in personal characteristics of patients or their environment. Gender differences in their relationship with the physicians are also minimal and in general both the relationship with the physician as the adhesion to hypertension treatment are good throughout this population.
References
Agyemang, C., C. van Hooijdonk, W. Wendel-Vos, J. Ujcic-Voortman, E. Lindeman, K. Stronks & M. Droomers. 2007. Ethnic differences in the effect of environmental stressors on blood pressure and hypertension in the Netherlands. BMC Public Health 7-118.
Bardorf, T., F. Hecht, C. Rubow & J. Gerstoft. 2006. Physicians’ communication with patients about adherence to HIV medication in San Francisco and Copenhagen: a qualitative study using Grounded Theory. BioMed Central Services Research 6: 1-12.
Bautista, A. & G. Pérez. 2003. Evaluación y manejo actual de la hipertensión arterial esencial. Acta Neurológica Colombia 19: 69-72.
Caja Costarricense de Seguro Social. 2002. Estadística de los Servicios de Salud, 2002. Departamento de Estadística. Costa Rica.
Caja Costarricense de Seguro Social. 2002. Guías para la detección, diagnóstico y tratamiento de la Hipertensión Arterial en el primer nivel de atención. Costa Rica, 2-62.
Caja Costarricense de Seguro Social, Ministerio de Salud y Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Comisión Interinstitucional Trazadora Hipertensión Arterial. (2005). Metodología para evaluar la calidad de la atención de la hipertensión arterial: trazadora de hipertensión arterial. Costa Rica, 1-96.
Crespo, N., J. Rubio, M. Casado, J. Sánchez & S. Campo. 2000. Factores modulares de la adherencia farmacológica en hipertensión arterial, estudio exploratorio. Rev. Hipertensión España 17: 1-7.
Espinoza, F., G. Ceja, B. Trujillo, T. Uribe, P. Abarca & D. Flores. 2004. Análisis de los factores de riesgo de la hipertensión arterial en Colima, México. Rev Panamá Salud Pública 16: 402–407.
García A., F. Leiva, F. Martos, A. García & D. Prados. 2000. ¿Cómo diagnosticar el cumplimiento terapéutico en atención primaria? Medicina de la Familia 1: 13-19.
Haijar, I. & T. Kotchen. 2006. Hypertension: Trends in prevalence, incidence and control. Annual Review Public Health 27:465-490.
Hall, R., J. Hernández, O. Carranza, F. Serrano, J. Martínez, G. Rosencranc & L. St. Clai. 2007. Relaciones médico- paciente, un estudio empírico. Medicina y Ética, 3, 315-336.
Holguín, L., D. Correa, M. Aivillaga, M. Cáceres & M. Varela. 2006. Adherencia al tratamiento de Hipertensión Arterial: Efectividad de un programa de intervención biopsicosocial. University Psychologic Colombia 5: 535-547.
Johnell, K., L. Råstam, T. Lithman, & J. Merlo. 2005. Low adherence with antihypertensives in actual practice: the association with social participation – a multilevel analysis. BioMed Central Public Health 5:1-7.
Joint National Committee. 2007. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. National Heart Lung and Blood Institute.
La Rosa, Y., L. Martín & H. Bayarre. 2007. Adherencia terapéutica y factores psicosociales en pacientes hipertensos. Rev. Cubana Medicina Gral Integral 23:1-5.
Martín, L., H. Bayarre & J. Grau. 2008. Validación del cuestionario MBG (Martín-Bayarre-Grau) para evaluar la adherencia terapéutica en hipertensión arterial. Rev. Cubana Salud Pública 34.
Méndez, E. & L. Roxero. 2007. Prevalencia de Hipertensión en adultos mayores en Costa Rica. Población salud Mesoamérica 5: 1-9.
Organización Mundial de Salud. 2003. Adherencia a los tratamientos a largo plazo, pruebas para la acción 1-187.
Organización Panamericana de la Salud. 2007. Encuesta de Dia- betes, Hipertensión y factores de riesgo de enfermedades crónicas. Guatemala: PAHO 1-77.
Palacín, F., C. Silva & L. Krotter. 2002. Factores cognitivos en la adherencia al tratamiento. Congreso Internacional de Psiquiatría. Argentina.
Ramírez, T., P. Nájera & G. Nigenda. 1998. Percepción de la calidad de la atención de los servicios de salud en México: Perspectiva de los usuarios. Rev. Salud Pública México40: 1-5.
Rivas, J., C. Gutiérrez & J. Rivas. 2008. Tratamiento y costos farmacológicos de la Hipertensión Arterial no complicada en un hospital regional. Rev. Peruana Cardiología 34: 181-190.
Suárez, C. & R. Gabriel. 2000. Epidemiología de la Hipertensión Arterial en España. Cardiovascular Risk Factors 9: 239-246.
W Choo, P., C. Rand, T. Inui, M. Ting Lee, C. Canning & R. Platt. 2001. A cohort study of possible risk factors for over-reporting of antihypertensive adherence. BioMed Central Cardiovasculars Disorders 1: 1-6.
Weisner, C., V. Vejarano, M. Caicedo, M. Tovar & D. Cendales. 2006. La citología de cuello uterino en Soacha, Colombia, representaciones sociales, barreras y motivaciones. Rev. Salud Pública Univ. Nacional Colombia 8:185-196.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Note: This abstract contains an incorrect copyright due to technical issues. Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
All journal contents are freely available through a CC BY 4.0 license.
CC BY 4.0 is a Creative Commons: you can copy, modify, distribute, and perform, even for commercial reasons, without asking permission, if you give appropriate credit.
Contents can be reproduced if the source and copyright are acknowledged according to the Open Access license CC BY 4.0. Self-storage in preprint servers and repositories is allowed for all versions. We encourage authors to publish raw data and data logs in public repositories and to include the links with all drafts so that reviewers and readers can consult them at any time.
The journal is financed by public funds via Universidad Estatal a Distancia and editorial independence and ethical compliance are guaranteed by the Board of Editors, UNED. We do not publish paid ads or receive funds from companies.