The effect of feedback on performance and motivation in students taking Research methods for Health Sciences at UNED, Costa Rica

The effect of feedback on performance and motivation in students taking Research methods for Health Sciences at UNED, Costa Rica

Authors

  • Carmen Andrés Jiménez Universidad Estatal a Distancia, UNED
  • Rebeca González Zúñiga Universidad Estatal a Distancia, UNED

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22458/urj.v8i2.1560

Keywords:

Feedback, evaluate, performance, motivation, learning.

Abstract

Feedback is an important tool in the distance learning process, it helps students to be more critical and analytic. The goal of this study was to measure the effect that feedback has on performance and motivation. We evaluated four tasks in which students had feedback and applied a survey that measured students’ satisfaction with feedback. A significant improvement was found only between the third and the fourth tasks, suggesting that students wait until the end to apply what they learned; other problems include: that feedback was not always positive, unclear instructions about bibliographical references and insufficient time. We recommend strategies that can improve feedback, such as verbal instead of written feedback, co-evaluation and making students reflect, instead of giving them the correct answer.

References

Ávila, P. (2009). La importancia de la retroalimentación en los procesos de evaluación. Una revisión del estado de arte. Universidad del Valle de México. México.

Bandiera, O., Larcinese, V & Rasul, I. (2015). Blissful ignorance? A natural experiment on the effect of feedback on students’ performance. Labour Economics, 34, 13-25.

Hamer, J., Purchase, H., Luxton-Reilly, A & Denny, P. (2015). A comparison of peer and tutor feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(1), 151-164.

Kluger, A & DeNisi, A. (1996). The Effects of Feedback Interventions on Performance: A Historical Review, a Meta-Analysis, and a Preliminary Feedback Intervention Theory. Psychological bulletin, 119 (2): 254.

Krenn, B., Würth, S., & Hergovich, A. (2013). The impact of feedback on goal setting and task performance: Testing the feedback intervention theory. Swiss Journal of Psychology/Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Revue Suisse de Psychologie, 72(2), 79.

Natarajan, M. (2015). Innovative Teaching Techniques for Distance Education. Communications of the IIM, 5 (4), 73-80.

Rogerson-Revell, P. (2015). Constructively aligning technologies with learning and assessment in a distance education master’s programme. Distance Education, 36(1), 129-147.

Sadler, R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119-144.

Timmers, C., Walraven, A & Veldkamp, B. (2015). The effect of regulation feedback in a computer-based formative assessment on information problem solving. Computers & education, 87, 1-9.

Valdivia, S. (2014). Retroalimentación Efectiva en la Enseñanza Universitaria. En Blanco y Negro, 5 (2), 20-24.

Van de Ridder, J; Peters; Stokking; de Ru & Ten Cate. (2015). Framing of feedback impacts student’s satisfaction, self-efficacy and performance. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 1-14.

Published

2016-10-12

How to Cite

Andrés Jiménez, C., & González Zúñiga, R. (2016). The effect of feedback on performance and motivation in students taking Research methods for Health Sciences at UNED, Costa Rica. UNED Research Journal, 8(2), 189–194. https://doi.org/10.22458/urj.v8i2.1560

Issue

Section

Articles
Loading...