Human-wildlife conflict in a buffer zone in San Ramón, Costa Rica
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22458/urj.v15i1.4462Keywords:
domestic animals, incidents, mammals, predators, snakesAbstract
“Human-wildlife conflict in a buffer zone in San Ramón, Costa Rica”. Introduction: Currently, biodiversity is mainly managed by protected areas, but proximity with human activities results in conflicts, which are poorly studied in the tropics. Objective: To estimate human-wildlife conflict in the buffer zone of the Alberto Manuel Brenes Biological Reserve, San Ramón, Costa Rica. Methods: We interviewed the owners or managers of 59 farms. Results: We recorded 540 incidents, mostly with mammals (N=479); coyotes (Canis latrans) killed 1 074 animals in 183 attacks at 12 farms. We also recorded conflicts with jaguar, Panthera onca, puma, Puma concolor, ocelot, Leopardus pardalis, and margay, Leopardus wiedii, which preyed on 261 domestic animals. Other mammals and snakes were also reported, especially the Fer-de-lance, Bothrops asper. In six occasions, the incidents took place over 500m from a house; however, most were 0-25m from a house (mean 398m). The farmers have sacrificed pumas, coyotes, raccoons and snakes and there was not a coordinated control effort from institutions, NGOs and communities. Conclusion: Coyotes are the most common wild animals involved and there is need for a coordinated effort that includes both organizations and communities.
References
Almanza, F. (2002). Caracterización de la depredación de animales domésticos por grandes felinos (Panthera onca y Puma concolor) y su presencia en zonas rurales de Costa Rica 1990-2000 [Tesis de Maestría Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica].
Amador-Alcalá, S., Naranjo, E.J., & Jiménez-Ferrer, G. (2013). Wildlife predation on livestock and poultry: implications for predator conservation in the rainforest of south-east Mexico. Oryx, 47(2), 243-250. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0030605311001359
Amit, R., Rojas, K., Alfaro, L. D., & Carrillo, E. (2009). Conservación de felinos y sus presas dentro de fincas ganaderas Informe técnico. Programa Jaguar-ICOMVIS-UNA. https://bit.ly/40hEA4u
Azevedo, F. C., & Murray, D. L. (2007). Spatial organization and food habits of Jaguars (Panthera onca) in a food plain forest. Biological Conservation, 137 (3), 391-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.02.022
Bhatia, S., Redpath, S. M., Suryawanshi, K., & Mishra, C. (2020). Beyond conflict: exploring the spectrum of human–wildlife interactions and their underlying mechanisms. Oryx, 54(5), 621-628. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003060531800159X
Briggs-González, V., Harvey, R., Mazzotti, F., & Giuliano, W. (2011). Una guía para convivir con felinos silvestres. Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS). https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/publication/UW361
Cui, Q., Ren, Y., & Xu, H. (2021). The escalating effects of wildlife tourism on human–wildlife conflict. Animals, 11(5), 1378. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11051378
Davies-Mostert, H., Hodkinson, C., Komen, H., & Snow, T. (2007). Predators and farmers. Endangered Wildlife Trust.
D’Amico, M. P. (2015). Debates sobre conservación y áreas naturales protegidas: paradigmas consolidados y nuevos horizontes. Letras Verdes. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Socioambientales, 18, 208-226. https://doi.org/10.17141/letrasverdes.18.2015.1662
Dunnink, J., Hartley, R., Rutina, L., Alves, J., & Franco, A. (2020). A socio-ecological landscape analysis of human–wildlife conflict in northern Botswana. Oryx, 54(5), 661–669. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605318001394
Gordillo, J. (2010). Depredación de ganado por jaguares y pumas en el noreste de Costa Rica y la percepción de los finqueros hacia ese problema [Tesis de Maestría, Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica]. https://bit.ly/3xe6kel
Gulatia, S., Karanthc, K. K., Anh Le, N., & Noack, F. (2021). Human casualties are the dominant cost of human–wildlife conflict in India. PNAS, 118(8), e1921338118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1921338118
Hoogesteijn, R., & Hoogesteijn, A. (2005). Manual sobre problemas de depredación causados por grandes felinos en hatos ganaderos. Wildlife Conservation Society.
Hoogesteijn, R. & Hoogesteijn, A. (2009). El búfalo de agua, eficiente solución a los problemas de depredación por felinos en las sabanas inundables del trópico suramericano. En J. Salomón, R. Romero, J. De Venanzi & M. Arias. (Eds.), XXIV Curso sobre Bovinos de Carne (pp. 205-229). Facultad de Ciencias veterinarias, Universidad Central de Venezuela.
König, H. J., Ceauşu, S., Reed, M., Kendall, H., Hemminger, K., Reinke, H., Ostermann-Miyashita, E-F., Wenz, E., Eufemia, L., Hermanns, T., Klose, T., Spyra, M., Kuemmerle, T., & Ford, A. T. (2021). Integrated framework for stakeholder participation: Methods and tools for identifying and addressing human–wildlife conflicts. Conservation Science and Practice, 3(3), e399. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.399
Krebs, C. J., Boonstra, R., Boutin, S., Y Sinclair, A. R. E. (2001). What drives the 10- year Cycle of Snowshoe Hares? Bioscience, 51(1), 25-35. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0025:WDTYCO]2.0.CO;2
Marchini, S. (2014). Who’s in conflict with whom? Human dimensions of the conflicts involving wildlife. In L. M. Verdade, M. C. Lyra-Jorge, & C. I. Piña (Eds.), Applied ecology and human dimensions in biological conservation (pp. 189-209). Springer.
Mora, J. M., & Solano-Gómez, R. (2022). Impacto económico de los conflictos humano-fauna silvestre en la zona de amortiguamiento de la reservaBiológica Alberto Manuel Brenes, Costa Rica. UNED Research Journal, 14(1), e4007. https://doi.org/10.22458/urj.v14i1.4007
Mora, J. M., López, L., Sánchez, R., & Ruedas, L.A. (2020). Murciélagos de la reservaBiológica Alberto Manuel Brenes. Editorial Universidad de Costa Rica.
Moya, M., & Brenes, L. (2017). Rutas turísticas en la zona de amortiguamiento de la reservaBiológica Alberto Manuel Brenes (ReBAMB). Revista Pensamiento Actual, 17(Supl. 1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.15517/pa.v17i28.1.29676
Nyhus, P. J. (2016). Human–wildlife conflict and coexistence. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 41, 143-171. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085634
Polisar, J., Matix, I., Scognamillo, D., Farrell, M., Sunquist, M. E., & Eisenberg, J. F. (2003). Jaguars, pumas, their prey base, and cattle ranching: ecological interpretations of a management problem. Biological Conservation, 109(2), 297-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3207(02)00157-x
Pringle, R. M. (2017). Upgrading protected areas to conserve wild biodiversity. Nature, 546, 91-99. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22902
Ripple, W. J., Estes, J. A., Beschta, R. L., Wilmers, C. C., Ritchie, E. G., Hebblewhite, M., Berger, J., Elmhagen, B., Letnic, M., Nelson, M. P., Schmitz, O. J., Smith, D. W., Wallach, A. D., & Wirsing A. J. (2014). Status and ecological effects of the world’s largest carnivores. Science, 343(6167), 1241484. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1241484
Robertson, J., Roodbol, M., Bowles M., Dures, S., & Rowcliffe, J. (2020). Environmental predictors of livestock predation: a lion's tale. Oryx, 54(5), 648-657. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605318001217
Romañach, S., Lindsey, P.A. & Woodroffe, R. (2011). Attitudes Toward Predators and Options for Their Conservation in the Ewaso Ecosystem. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 632, 86-93.
Sánchez, R., Brenes, L., Chavarría, K., & Mejías, Y. (2021). Abundancia relativa, diversidad y patrones de actividad de mamíferos terrestres medianos y grandes, sendero Pájaro Sombrilla, reservaBiológica Alberto Manuel Brenes, Alajuela, Costa Rica. Revista Pensamiento Actual, 21(36), 37-57. https://doi.org/10.15517/PA.V21I36.47014
Woodroffe, R., & Ginsberg, J. R. (1998). Edge effects and the extinction of populations inside protected areas. Science, 280(5372), 2126-2128. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.280.5372.2126
Zimmermann, A., & Stevens, J. (2021). Call for holistic, interdisciplinary and multilateral management of human–wildlife conflict and coexistence. Oryx, 55(4), 490-491. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605321000545
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 UNED Research Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Note: This abstract contains an incorrect copyright due to technical issues. Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
All journal contents are freely available through a CC BY 4.0 license.
CC BY 4.0 is a Creative Commons: you can copy, modify, distribute, and perform, even for commercial reasons, without asking permission, if you give appropriate credit.
Contents can be reproduced if the source and copyright are acknowledged according to the Open Access license CC BY 4.0. Self-storage in preprint servers and repositories is allowed for all versions. We encourage authors to publish raw data and data logs in public repositories and to include the links with all drafts so that reviewers and readers can consult them at any time.
The journal is financed by public funds via Universidad Estatal a Distancia and editorial independence and ethical compliance are guaranteed by the Board of Editors, UNED. We do not publish paid ads or receive funds from companies.