Quality, during storage, of chicken eggs (Gallus gallus domesticus) coated with oil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22458/urj.v15i2.4685Keywords:
Shelf life, palm, mineral, cover, room temperatureAbstract
Introduction: Eggs are one of the main foods providing nutrients to the world population, however, they rapidly loose quality. For the egg industry it would be beneficial to have technological alternatives to increase the shelf life, such as coatings that are applied to prevent quality loss. Objective: To evaluate the effect of the application of oil coatings on the physicochemical, microbiological, and sensory quality of hen eggs during storage. Methods: We applied, by immersion, coatings of deodorized medicinal grade mineral oil or palm and soybean olein with TBHQ 0,02% to category A Isa Brown hen eggs from a local producer, without prior cleaning, washing or disinfection. After a 6-hour drainage, we stored eggs at 21°C and 43% RH. We measured selected quality parameter every 7 days for a total of 42 days and statically compared trends over time for coated and uncoated eggs. Sensory analysis was also carried out using paired comparisons tests for fresh and coated eggs stored for a certain time. We used a hedonic scale for general acceptance of coated and uncoated eggs after 35 days of storage. Results: The evaluated coatings did not affect the normal behavior of the color and pH of the yolk, the Haugh units, the resistance to rupture and the total aerobic and yeast and mold counts during storage, while retarding the deterioration related to the yolk index, pH of the white and overall mass loss. In addition, the application of the coatings helped keep flavor perception of stored eggs when compared with fresh eggs; resulted in eggs with the same smell and adhesiveness as the uncoated egg; gave shine, and did not negatively influence external sensory acceptance. Conclusion: The shelf life of eggs during storage can be extended with the application of mineral or palm oil coatings.
References
Alvarado, J. (28 de enero de 2023). ¿Por qué el kilo de huevo es ¢800 más caro que hace un año y cuánto más podría subir? El Observador. https://goo.by/a95TA
Association of Official Agricultural Chemists (AOAC). (2005). AOAC official method 981.12 pH of acidified foods. http://www.eoma.aoac.org/methods/info.asp?ID=18372
Bhale, S., No, H.K., Prinyawiwatkul, W., Farr, A., Nadarajah, K., & Meyers, S.P. (2003). Chitosan coating improves shelf life of eggs. Journal of Food Science, 68(7), 2378-2383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2003.tb05776.x
Bradley, F. A., & King, A. J. (2014). Egg Basics for the Consumer: Packaging, Storage, and Nutritional Information. University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources. https://doi.org/10.3733/ucanr.8154
Biladeau, A. M., & Keener, K. M. (2009). The effects of edible coatings on chicken egg quality under refrigerated storage. Poultry Science, 88(6), 1266-1274. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00295
Cader, S., Goburdhun, D., & Neetoo, H. (2014) Assessment of the microbial safety and quality of eggs from small and large-scale hen breeders. Journal of World´s Poultry Research, 4(4), 75-81. https://goo.by/qGrjJ
Caner, C., & Yüceer, M. (2015). Efficacy of various protein-based coating in enhancing the shelf life of fresh eggs during storage. Poultry Science, 94(7), 1665-1677. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev102
Carraro, A., & Antunes, A. (2004). Internal quality of eggs coated with whey protein concentrate. Scientia Agricola 61(3), 276-280. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162004000300006
Clark, M. A., Springmann, M., Hill, J., & Tilman, D. (2019). Multiple health and environmental impacts of foods. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(46), 23357-23362. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/26861428
Comisión de las Comunidades Europeas. (2008). Reglamento (CE) N°589/2008 que establecen las disposiciones de aplicación del Reglamento (CE) no 1234/2007 del Consejo en lo que atañe a las normas de comercialización de los huevos. Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea. Del 23 de junio de 2008 https://goo.by/p5xCN
da Silva Pires, P. G., Bavaresco, C., da Silva Pires, P. D., Cardinal, K. M., Rodrigues Leuven, A. F., & Andretta, I. (2021). Development of an innovative green coating to reduce egg losses. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 2, 100065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2021.100065
Decreto Ejecutivo N°33115-MEIC-MAG-S. (2006). Reglamento Técnico: RTCR 397:2006 Huevos Frescos o Refrigerados de Gallina para consumo humano. Diario Oficial La Gaceta, 128. Del 04 de julio del 2006. Costa Rica. http://www.mag.go.cr/legislacion/2006/de-33115.pdf
Eisen, E. J., Bohren, B. B., & McKean, H. E. (1962). The Haugh unit as a measure of egg albumen quality. Poultry Science, 41(5), 1461-1468. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0411461
Ennis, J. M., & Jesionka, V. (2011). The power of sensory discrimination methods revisited. Journal of Sensory Studies, 26(5), 371-382. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459X.2011.00353.x
Ennis, D., & Rousseau, B. (2020). Tools and Applications of Sensory and Consumer Science. The Institute of Perception.
Ennis, J. M., Rousseau, B., & Ennis, D. M. (2014). Sensory Difference Tests as Measurement Instruments: a Review of Recent Advances. Journal of Sensory Studies, 29(2), 89-102. https://doi.org/10.1111/joss.12086
Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2022). Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM). https://goo.by/1fX1M
Gautron, J., Dombre, C., Nau, F., Feidt, C., & Guillier, L. (2022). Review: Production factors affecting the quality of chicken table eggs and egg products in Europe, Animal, 16(suppl. 1), 100425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2021.100425
Jones, D., & Musgrove, M. (2005). Effects of extended storage on egg quality factors. Poultry Science, 84(11), 1774-1777. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.11.1774
Madrigal-Portilla, J., Salas-Durán, C., & Macaya-Quirós, S. (2023). Efecto de temperatura y tiempo de almacenamiento sobre la calidad del huevo de gallinas. Agronomía Mesoamericana, 34(2), 51223. https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v34i2.51223
Muñoz, J., & Vellojín, J. (2002). Producción de huevos con gallinas bajo pastoreo [Tesis de Licenciatura en Ingeniería Agronómica, Universidad EARTH]. Biblioteca Will Keith Kellog.
Nongtaodum, S., Jangchud, A., Jangchud, K., Dhamvithee, P., No, H., & Prinyawiwatkul, W. (2013). Oil coating affects internal quality and sensory acceptance of selected attributes of raw eggs during storage. Journal of Food Science 78(2), S329-S335. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.12035
Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Agricultura y la Alimentación (FAO). (2020). Egg marketing: a guide for the production and sales of eggs (FAO publication 6895). https://teca.apps.fao.org/teca/es/technologies/6895
Park, Y., Yoo, I., Jeon, K., Kim, H., Chang, E., & Oh, H. (2003). Effect of various eggshell treatments on the egg quality during storage. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 16(8), 1224-1229. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2003.1224
Pascual, M., & Calderón, V. (2000). Microbiología alimentaria. Editorial de Santos.
Petrović, M., Karačić, V., Mazija, H., Vahčić, N., & Medić H. (2016). Stability and sensory evaluation of eggs produced by addition of different amount of linseed oil into feed. Croatian Journal of Food Technology, Biotechnology and Nutrition 11(1-2), 41-48. https://hrcak.srce.hr/166829
Pires, P. G. S., Leuven, A. F. R., Franceschi, C., Machado, G. S., Pires, P. D. S., Moraes, P. O., Kindlein, L., & Andretta, I. (2019). Effects of rice protein coating enriched with essential oils on internal quality and shelf life of eggs during room temperature storage. Poultry Science, 99(1), 604–611. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez546
Pujols, K. (2012). Efecto del recubrimiento con aceite de soya, alfa y beta quitosano y sus combinaciones en emulsión en la claidad y vida de anaquel del huevo. [Tesis de Licenciatura, Universidad Zamorano]. Biblioteca Wilson Popenoe. http://hdl.handle.net/11036/1217
Réhault-Godbert, S., Guyot, N., & Nys, Y. (2019). The golden egg: nutritional value, bioactivities, and emerging benefits for human health. Nutrients, 11(3), 684. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11030684
Roessler, E. B., Pangborn, R. M., Sidel, J. L., & Stone, H. (1978). Expanded statistical tables for estimating in paired-preference, paired-difference, duo-trio and triangle tests. Journal of Food Science, 43(3), 940-943.
Ruiz, B. (2020). Empresas líderes 2020: Fuerte crecimiento de la avicultura latinoamericana en 2019. Industria Avícola, 67(3), 4-25. https://goo.by/ch82a
Ryu, K. N., No, H. K., & Prinyawiwatkul, W. (2011). Internal quality and shelf life of eggs coated with oils from different sources. Journal of Food Science, 76(5), S325-S329. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02177.x
Samli, H., Agma, A., & Senkoylu, N. (2005). Effects of storage time and temperature on egg quality in old laying hens. Poultry Science, 14(3), 548-553. https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/14.3.548
Sert, D., Aygun, A., & Demir, M. K. (2011). Effect of ultrasonic treatment and storage temperature on egg quality. Poultry Science, 90(4), 869-875. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-00799
Suppakul, P., Jutakorn, K., & Bangchokedee, Y. (2010). Efficacy of cellulose-based coating on enhancing the shelf life of fresh eggs. Journal of Food Engineering, 98(2), 207-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2009.12.027
Torrico, D. D., No, H. K., Prinyawiwatkul, W., James, M., Corredor, J. A., & Osorio, L. F. (2011). Mineral oil-chitosan emulsión coatings affect quality and shelf-life of coated eggs during refrigerated and room temperature storage. Journal of Food Science, 76(4), S262-S268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02125.x
Villanueva, N., Petenate, A., & Da Silva, M. (2005). Performance of the hybrid hedonic scale as compared to the traditional hedonic, self-adjusting and ranking scales. Food Quality and Preference, 16(8), 691-703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.03.013
Waimaleongora-ek, P., García, K., No, H. K., Prinyawiwatkul, W., & Ingram, D. (2009). Selected quality and shelf-life of eggs coated with mineral oil with different viscosities. Journal of Food Science, 74(9), S423-S429. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2009.01341.x
Yüceer, M., & Caner, C. (2014). Antimicrobial lysozime-chitosan coatings affect functional properties and shelf life of chicken eggs during storage. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 94(1), 153-162. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6322
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 UNED Research Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Note: This abstract contains an incorrect copyright due to technical issues. Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
All journal contents are freely available through a CC BY 4.0 license.
CC BY 4.0 is a Creative Commons: you can copy, modify, distribute, and perform, even for commercial reasons, without asking permission, if you give appropriate credit.
Contents can be reproduced if the source and copyright are acknowledged according to the Open Access license CC BY 4.0. Self-storage in preprint servers and repositories is allowed for all versions. We encourage authors to publish raw data and data logs in public repositories and to include the links with all drafts so that reviewers and readers can consult them at any time.
The journal is financed by public funds via Universidad Estatal a Distancia and editorial independence and ethical compliance are guaranteed by the Board of Editors, UNED. We do not publish paid ads or receive funds from companies.