Citizen participation: challenges for an active citizenship facing climate change

Citizen participation: challenges for an active citizenship facing climate change

Authors

  • Carolina Álvarez-Vergnani FLACSO-Sede Académica de Costa Rica

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22458/urj.v11i1.2325

Keywords:

citizen participation, democracy, citizenship, governance, dialogue, negotiation, climate change

Abstract

Democracy is measured by the degree of citizen participation in decision-making processes, not only those that are procedural, but also those that require people own action. Despite the importance of participatory processes, as well as the dedication of time and economic resources provided by States to the formulation of public policy related to addressing climate change, in many Latin American populations, they perceive that the processes are not suitable, sufficient or efficient. While it is true that, from the Government, these spaces should be promoted and actions taken to strengthen citizen skills, as well as institutional capacities and the regulatory body to achieve participatory processes of weight, as citizenship we must question whether we are really demanding these spaces of the best way and in the cases where they exist, if we are making a correct, profitable and strategic use. The information, the issuance of assertive criteria, and an active intervention, are levels of participation that ideally should always be present, strengthening both the structures and the actions for governance, in search of the common good. The most evolved forms of conflict resolution should be clear that democracy is not equal to the unanimity, and that these processes rather seek common ground in pluralism. A weakening of participatory processes can cause a weakening of democracy, poor management of public goods and services, and therefore the privatization of the State. This implies that as citizens we must learn to inform ourselves, to be clear about our interests, to dialogue and negotiate in search of agreements, and to consider, therefore, the diversity of opinions in the process.

References

Anduiza, E., & Bosch, A. (2004). Comportamiento político y electoral. Barcelona: Ariel.

Barnes, S. y Kaase, M. (1979). Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies. Beverly Hills: Sage.

CEPAL (Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe). (2018). Acceso a la información, la participación y la justicia en asuntos ambientales en América Latina y el Caribe: hacia el logro de la Agenda 2030 para el Desarrollo Sostenible (LC/TS.2017/83). Recuperado de: https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/43301/4/S1701021_es.pdf

Comisión de Derechos Humanos. (1948). Declaración Universal de los Derechos Humanos. Naciones Unidas, Francia.

Granados-Solís, G. (2017). La relevancia de la transparencia, apertura y participación ciudadana en la lucha contra el cambio climático. Sinergias, 25-28.

Guillén-Araya, J. M. (2016). El Panorama de las Acciones Colectivas en Costa Rica. Vigesimosegundo Informe Estado de la Nación en Desarrollo Humano Sostenible, Costa Rica.

Guzmán, S., & Castillo, M. (2016). INDCs y participación ciudadana en América Latina. Grupo de Financiamiento Climático para América Latina y el Caribe (GFLAC). Recuperado de: http://extrayendotransparencia.grupofaro.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/292797341-INDCs-y-participacion-ciudadana-en-America-Latina.pdf

Hernández Valle, R. (2002). De la democracia representativa a la democracia participativa. Anuario Iberoamericano de Justicia Constitucional, 6, 199-219 pp. Recuperado de: https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/AIJC/article/view/50596/30832

Milbrath, L. y Goel, M. (1977). Political participation: how and why do people get involved in politics?. Chicago: Rand McNally Colleg.

Morales, L. (2002). Associational Membership and Social Capital in Comparative Perspective: The Problems of Measurement. Politics and Society, 30, 497-523.

Morales, L. (2005). ¿Existe una crisis participativa? La evolución de la participación política y el asociacionismo en España. Revista Española de Ciencia Política, 13, 51-87. Recuperado de: https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/recp/article/view/37411

Norris, P. (1999a). Conclusions: The Growth of Critical Citizens and Its Consequences, en Pippa Norris, ed., Critical Citizens. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Norris, P. (1999b). Critical Citizens. Global Support for Democratic Governance. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.

Norris, P. (2002). Democratic Phoenix. Reinventing Political Activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Plataforma LEDS LAC et al. (2017). Mecanismos de Coordinación Interinstitucional para una Política Climática Efectiva en Latinoamérica y el Caribe Documento de trabajo. Grupo Banco Mundial. Recuperado de: http://ledslac.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Mecanismos-Coordinaci%C3%B3n-Interinstitucional.-Working-Paper_final.pdf

Putnam, R, & Goss, K. A. (2002). Introduction, en Robert Putnam, ed., Democracies in Flux. The Evolution of Social Capital in Contemporary Societies. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.

Torres-Rivas, E. (2001). Contrapunto entre reforma y revolución: La democracia en Costa Rica y Guatemala. Trabajo elaborado durante la estadía de investigación en el David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies de la Universidad de Harvard durante el segundo trimestre del año 2000. Recuperado de: http://bibliotecavirtual.clacso.org.ar/ar/libros/coedicion/rivas/06contra.pdf

Welzel, C., Inglehart, R., & Deutsch, F. (2005). Social Capital, Voluntary Associations, and Collective Action: Which Aspects of Social Capital Have the Greatest “Civic” Payoff? Journal of Civil Society, 1(2), 121-146.

Published

2019-03-13

How to Cite

Álvarez-Vergnani, C. (2019). Citizen participation: challenges for an active citizenship facing climate change. UNED Research Journal, 11(1), S78-S88. https://doi.org/10.22458/urj.v11i1.2325
Loading...