The female sex work market in San Jose, Costa Rica.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22458/urj.v1i1.231Keywords:
Sex work, economy, market, supply, demand, price, savings, prostitution.Abstract
The female sex work market in San Jose, Costa Rica. Sex work is a commercial transaction and is part of the economy, but social practices hide it and it is seldom mentioned in economic reports. In 2008 we interviewed 78 female sex workers in San José, capitol city of Costa Rica. They belonged in three groups: women working in the area surrounding the markets, fare US$3 to US$8 per hour and aged 26 to 81 years, workers at two massage parlors in San Juan de Tibás (US$18 to US$72 per hour, ages 18 to 33 years) and “call-girls” (US$100 an hour; 19 to 38 years). The interviews were based on a questionnaire; respondents were paid their time, and data were analyzed with the SPSS statistical program. Depending on the group, between half and a majority consider sex work an acceptable way for women to obtain resources for their families, and for men, a sexual relief that reduces sexual violence. Women have no boss and decide independently on time and place of work. They reject customers if there is no agreement on which specific services they will provide. Few have experienced violence or sexually transmitted diseases as a result of their sex work. Most have no husband or permanent companion. The preferred client is kind, mature and deals always with the same woman. Undesirable customers are aggressive, mean, dirty and drugged. Customers are mostly married and aged 35-45 years. The requested services are diverse, but are dominated by oral sex and the “missionary” position. The rate is defined by group membership (market area, parlor or “call girl”) and not by age. Earnings vary widely but generally are much higher than those for jobs appropriate to their low educational level. There is little culture of saving, and women have full decision on how they spend their earnings, which they mainly use to raise their children and support other relatives. Because few women do sex work, this activity represents a small proportion of economy in the city of San Jose.
References
Acuña, O., C. Denton, & F. Naranjo. 1982. El trabajo sexual en SanJosé. Estudio socioeconómico de un problema costarricense. Universidad Nacional, Heredia, Costa Rica.
Becker, G. 1973. A Theory of Marriage. Journal of Political Economy 81: 813-846 .
Becker, G. 1976. The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, EEUU.
Della G., M., M. Di Tommaso & S. Strøm. 2005. Who’s watching? -The market for prostitution services. Centre for Household, Income, Labour, and Demographic Economics. Working Papers N° 16. Roma, Italia.
Edlund, L. & E. Korn. 2002. A Theory of Prostitution. Journal of Political Economy 110:181-214.
Farley, M. 2005. Prostitution harms women even if indoors. Violence Against Women 11: 950-964.
Fernández, R. & J. Rodríguez. 2005. Elementos históricos sobre el trabajo sexual femenino en Costa Rica. El caso del Valle Central Noroccidental. Diálogos: Revista Electrónica de Historia 6:1-43.
Foster, K.R., K. Parkinson & C.R. Thompson. 2007. What can microbial genetics teach sociobiology? Trends in Genetics 23: 74-80.
Gertler, P., M. Shah & S. Bertozzi. 2005. Risky Business: The Market for Unprotected Comercial Sex. Journal of Political Economy 113: 518-550.
Herrera, M. 2000. Detrás del telón...Entre lo imaginario y lo real. Estudio cualitativo sobre mujeres que hacen trabajo sexual. Tesis de Licenciatura. Escuela de Trabajo Social, Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica.
INEC. 2000. IX Censo Nacional de Población. Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas y Censos, San José, Costa Rica.
Lagarde, M. 2003. El feminismo y la mirada entre mujeres. Ponenciaen el Seminario Internacional sobre Liderazgo y Dirección para mujeres. “Poder y empoderamiento de las mujeres”. Valencia, España.
Leigh, C. 2008. The strange relationship between feminism and sex work. On The Issues Magazine (9 de noviembre 2008). (Disponible en http://www.alternet.org/story/98645/; consultado el 11 de noviembre de 2008).
Marín, H. 2005. La tierra del pecado, entre la quimera y el anhelo: Historia del trabajo sexual en Costa Rica, 1750-2005. Alma Mater, San José, Costa Rica.
Miller, B., J. Tybur & B. Jordan. 2007. Ovulatory cycle effects on tip earnings by lap dancers: economic evidence for human estrus? Evolution and Human Behavior 28: 375-381.
Monge-Nájera, J., R. Rojas C., R. Morales B. & I. Ramírez S. 2009. Trabajo sexual femenino en la ciudad de San José, Costa Rica: un enfoque sociobiológico al iniciarse el siglo XXI. Cuadernos de Investigación UNED 1: 27-31.
McKenzie, R. & G. Tullock. 1978. The New World of Economics: Exploration into the Human Experience. Irwin/McGraw-Hill, Nueva York, EEUU.
OECD. 2002. Measuring the Non-Observed Economy. A Handbook. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. OECD Publications Service, París, Francia.
Ortiz, M., A. Zamora, A. Rodríguez, L. Chacón & A. Gutiérrez. 1998. Soy una mujer de ambiente… Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica.
Posner, R. 1992. Sex and Reason. Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, EEUU.
Ramírez S., I., J. Monge-Nájera, R. Rojas C. & R. Morales B. 2009. La escolaridad en trabajadoras sexuales de la ciudad de San José, Costa Rica, al iniciarse el siglo XXI. Cuadernos de Investigación UNED 1: 33-42.
Rojas, A. & M. Scott. 1994. Relatos de vida y representación del dinero en cinco mujeres prostitutas del sector central de San José. Tesis de Licenciatura, Escuela de Psicología, Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica.
Schiebinger, I. 1993. Nature’s body. Gender in the making of modern science. Beakon Press, Boston, Massachussetts, EEUU.
Sisa, L. 2006. He aprendido a vivir bajo el sol. Fundación RAHAB, San José, Costa Rica.
Vandepitte, J., R. Lyerla, G. Dallabetta, F. Crabbé, M. Alary & A. Buvé. 2006. Estimates of the number of female sex workers in different regions of the world. Sexually Transmitted Infections 82 (Supl. 3): 18-25.
Weitzer, R. 2005. New directions in research on prostitution. Crime, Law & Social Change 43: 211–235.
Wilson, D.S. & E.O. Wilson. 2007. Rethinking the theoretical foundation of sociobiology. The Quaterly Review of Biology 82: 327-348.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Note: This abstract contains an incorrect copyright due to technical issues. Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
All journal contents are freely available through a CC BY 4.0 license.
CC BY 4.0 is a Creative Commons: you can copy, modify, distribute, and perform, even for commercial reasons, without asking permission, if you give appropriate credit.
Contents can be reproduced if the source and copyright are acknowledged according to the Open Access license CC BY 4.0. Self-storage in preprint servers and repositories is allowed for all versions. We encourage authors to publish raw data and data logs in public repositories and to include the links with all drafts so that reviewers and readers can consult them at any time.
The journal is financed by public funds via Universidad Estatal a Distancia and editorial independence and ethical compliance are guaranteed by the Board of Editors, UNED. We do not publish paid ads or receive funds from companies.