Local perceptions, attitudes, beliefs, and practices toward bird-window collisions in Monteverde, Costa Rica
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22458/urj.v10i1.2038Keywords:
bird-building collisions, methods to prevent collisions, bird mortality, Green building design, bird-friendly buildingsAbstract
Bird-window collisions are an important cause of bird mortality worldwide. Reducing collisions requires understanding of the costs and benefits perceived by stakeholders. I consulted two focus groups, conducted 18-semi-strcutured interviews and applied surveys to 58 residents of Monteverde, Costa Rica, to understand their perception of the problem. Many reported collisions in their houses but there is a lack of information about the magnitude of the situation. Black silhouettes are the most frequent method of prevention, even though they are mostly ineffective. The main factors for selecting methods include unblocked views, aesthetics, effectiveness, ease of installation and removal, and ease of maintenance. The preferred effective method was cords (Acopian Bird Savers), and painted dots was the least liked. I recommend education about effective methods for Monteverde and similar communities.
References
Alleh, K. E. (2015). Trade-offs in nature tourism: contrasting parcel-level decisions with landscape conservation planning. Ecology and Society, 20(1), 1-10.
American Bird Conservancy. (2015). Bird-Friendly Building Design. Retrieved from https://abcbirds.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Bird-friendly_Building_Guide_WEB.pdf
American Bird Conservancy. (2016, mayo 11). Stop birding hitting windows. Retrieved from Effective window solutions for home owners and architects. Retrieved from https://abcbirds.org/get-involved/bird-smart-glass/
Bell, A., Mesure, M., & Swaigen, J. (2017, March 22). Ontario all squawk, no action on protecting migrating birds. Opinion. Retrieved from thestar.com: https://www.thestar.com/opinion/commentary/2017/03/22/ontario-all-squawk-no-action-on-protecting-migrating-birds-opinion.html
Brant, G. (2000). Voluntary and Regulatory Approaches: What is Necessary in Conservation Today? Washington, D.C.: United States Department of Agriculture.
Burlingame, L. (2014). Conservación en la región de Monteverde: contribuciones de las organizaciones conservacionistas. In N. T. Wheelwright, & N. M. Nadkarni, Monteverde: ecología y conservación de un bosque nuboso tropical (pp. 546-622). Bowdoin's Scholars' Bookshelf. Book 3. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.bowdoin.edu/scholars-bookshelf/3/.
Cartín, N., & Ludwig, E. (1985). Monteverde. Revista Geográfica de América Central (21-22), 199-203.
David, J. (2009). The Creation and Management of Protected Areas in. Monteverde, Costa Rica. Global Environment, 3, 96–119. Retrieved from http://www.environmentandsociety.org/sites/default/files/key_docs/davis_2009_3_0.pdf
DeWeerdt, S. (2016, March). When Green Buidlings are deadly to birds. Conservation Magazine Retrieved from http://www.conservationmagazine.org/2016/03/green-buildings-deadly-to-birds/
FLAP. (2017, September 5). Rom and FLAP Annual Event. Retrieved from http://www.flap.org/
Graham, D. (1997). Spider webs and windows as potentially important sources of hummingbird mortality. Journal of Field Ornithology, 68(1), 98-101.
Hong, D. (2006). Preventing bird-window collisions: adding eyespots to falcon silhouettes. Monteverde, Costa Rica: EAP Tropical Biology Program, Costa Rica Spring.
ICT. (2017, September 4). Certificación para la sostenibilidad turística. Norma CST – Establecimientos de hospedaje. Retrieved from http://www.turismo-sostenible.co.cr/pdf/Norma_CST_Hoteles_Costa_Rica.pdf
Kenney, D. (2015). Aesthetic Danger: How the Human Need for Light and Spacious Views Kills Birds and what we can (and should) do to fix this invisible hazard. Journal of Animal & Natural Resource Law, XI, 137-160.
Klem, D. J. (1989). Bird-Window Collisions. Wilson Bulletin, 101(4), 606-620.
Klem, D. J. (1990a). Bird injuries, cause of death, and recuperation from collisions with windows. Journal of Field Ornithology, 61(1), 115-119.
Klem, D. J. (1990b). Collisions between birds and windows: mortality and prevention. Journal of Field Ornithology, 61(1), 120-128.
Klem, D. J. (2014). Landscape, Legal, and Biodiversity Threats that Windows Pose to Birds: A review of an Important Conservation Issue. Land, 3(1), 351-361.
Klem, D. J. (2015). Bird-Window Collisions: A Critical Animal Welfare and Conservation Issue. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 18, S11-S17.
Klem, D. J., & Saenger, P. (2013). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Select Visual Signals to Prevent Bird-window Collisions. The Wilson Journal of Ornithology, 125(2), 406-4011.
Klem, D. J., Keck, D., Marty, K., Miller, A., Ball, M., Niciu, E., & Platt, C. (2004). Effects of window angling, feeder placement, and scavengers on avian mortality at plate glass. Wilson Bulletin, 116(1) 69-73.
Lewis, R. K. (2011, August 12). Modern architects are really in love with glass. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/realestate/modern-architects-are-really-in-love-with-glass/2011/07/26/gIQA7zY0AJ_story.html?utm_term=.b6c29ffb2938
Loss, S. R., Will, T., Loss, S., & Marra, P. P. (2014). Bird-building collisions in the United States: Estimates of annual mortality and species vulnerability. The Condor,116, 8-23.
Menacho-Odio, R. M. (2015). Colisión de aves contra ventanas en Costa Rica: conociendo el problema a partir de datos de museos, ciencia ciudadana y el aporte de biólogos. Zeledonia, 19(1), 10-21.
Oviedo, S., & Menacho-Odio R. M. (2015). Actitud en la preferencia de métodos para evitar el choque de aves contra puertas y ventanas de vidrio en Costa Rica. Zeledonia 19(1): 22-31
Rogers, E. (1983). Diffusion of Innovations. New York: The Free Press.
Snep, R., Jip, L., Robert, K., Ruud, F., Holly, P., Monica, A., … & Yolanda, H. (2016). Urban bird conservation: presenting stakeholder-specific arguments for the development of bird-friendly cities. Urban Ecosystem, 19(4), 1535-1550. doi: 10.1007/s11252-015-0442-z
Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environemtanll behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 309-317.
Wheelwright, N. T. (1984). Tropical Fruit-eating Birds and their Food Plants: A Survey of a Costa Rican Lower Forest. Biotropica, 16(3), 173-192.
Young, B. E., Garvin, M. C., & McDonald, D. B. (1993). Blood parasites in birds from Monteverde, Costa Rica. Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 29(4), 550-560.
Young, B., & McDonald, D. (2014). Aves. In N. T. Wheelwright, & N. M. Nadkarni, Monteverde: Ecología y Conservación de un bosque tropical (pp. 266-303). Bowdoin's Scholars' Bookshelf. Book 3. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.bowdoin.edu/scholars-bookshelf/3/.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Note: This abstract contains an incorrect copyright due to technical issues. Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
All journal contents are freely available through a CC BY 4.0 license.
CC BY 4.0 is a Creative Commons: you can copy, modify, distribute, and perform, even for commercial reasons, without asking permission, if you give appropriate credit.
Contents can be reproduced if the source and copyright are acknowledged according to the Open Access license CC BY 4.0. Self-storage in preprint servers and repositories is allowed for all versions. We encourage authors to publish raw data and data logs in public repositories and to include the links with all drafts so that reviewers and readers can consult them at any time.
The journal is financed by public funds via Universidad Estatal a Distancia and editorial independence and ethical compliance are guaranteed by the Board of Editors, UNED. We do not publish paid ads or receive funds from companies.