Evolution of a community-based, Scarlet Macaw conservation organization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22458/urj.v4i1.135Abstract
This paper analyzed the evolution of a community-based effort to conserve the Central Pacific Scarlet Macaw (Ara macao) population in Costa Rica. Between 1990-1994, research demonstrated that the macaw population was declining, primarily due to chick poaching. Club Punta Leona, the town of Quebrada Ganado and the Universidad Nacional initiated the conservation efforts. Two regional workshops (1994, 1999) outlined and evaluated a protection strategy. Both workshops recommended: (a) carrying out strong environmental education programs, (b) protecting chicks in nests, (c) increasing macaw food and nesting sources, (d) research and monitoring of the macaw population, and (e) promoting the project and providing economic returns for local inhabitants. A local conservation organization, LAPPA, was created and attempted to carry out the strategy. Reviewing their successes, LAPPA’s board of directors considered they had been effective with respect to items a, b and d. Strategic planning conducted at the workshops was essential for the conservation work. The methodology utilized in the second workshop helped outline the Scarlet Macaw workplan more clearly then the first. Finally, funds channelled through LAPPA for macaw conservation work have been utilized effectively. To ensure future success, board members believe that this program requires: (a) additional community leaders in more communities, (b) yearly strategic planning, (c) funding to hire a full-time staff member, (d) continued environmental education for children, (e) a transparent accounting system, and (f ) continued research and monitoring.
KEY WORDS
Ara macao, community-based conservation, Costa Rica, environmental education, monitoring, Scarlet Macaw, strategic planning.
References
Agrawal, A. & C. Gibson. 1999. Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of community in natural resource conservation. World Development 27(4):629-649.
Alvarado, C. & J. Ballestero. 1995. Ostional, Costa Rica: An example of a seas turtle conservation strategy and social welfare. p. 4-7 In J. Bissonette & P. Krausman (eds). Integrating people and wildlife for a sustainable future. The Wildlife Society. Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Beissinger, S. & E. Bucher. 1992. Sustainable harvest of parrots for conservation. p. 73-116 In S. Beissinger & N. Snyder (eds). New world parrots in crisis: solutions from conservation biology. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., USA.
Boo, E. 1990. Ecotourism: The potentials and pitfalls. World Wildlife Fund. Washington, D.C., USA.
Brandon, K., K. Redford & S. Sanderson. 1998. Parks in peril: people, politics and protected areas. Island, Washington, D.C.,USA.
Collar, N. & A. Juniper. 1992. Dimensions and causes of the parrot conservation crisis. p. 1-24 In S. Beissinger and N. Snyder (eds). New world parrots in crisis: solutions from conservation biology. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., USA.
Dear, F., C. Vaughan & A. Morales. 2011. Current status and conservation of the Scarlet Macaw (Ara macao) in the Osa Conservation Area (ACOSA), Costa Rica. Cuadernos de Investigación 2: 3-17
Direccion General de Estadisticos y Censos. 1987. Censo Agropecuario 1984. Ministerio de Economia, Industria y Comercio. San Jose, Costa Rica.
Garcia, R. 1993. El sistema nacional de areas silvestres protegidas de Costa Rica: Un nuevo enfoque. Flora, Fauna y Areas Silvestres 6(15):14-18
Ghai, D. 1994. Development and environment: Sustaining people and nature. Special Issue. Development and Change 24.
Ghai, D. & J. Vivian. 1992. Grassroots environmental action: People’s participation in sustainable development. Routledge for UNRISD. London, United Kingdom
Hernandez, L. 1993. La extension y la educacion ambiental en el manejo del venado colablanca en Cobano, provincial de Puntarenas, Costa Rica. p. 359-368 In C. Vaughan & M. Rodriguez (eds). Ecologia y Manejo del Venado Colablanca en Mexico y Costa Rica. Universidad Nacional, Heredia, Costa Rica
Hulme, D. & M.Murphree. 2001a. African wildlife and livelihoods: the promise and performance of community conservation. James Currey Ltd. Oxford, United Kingdom.
Hulme, D. & M.Murphree. 2001b. Community conservation as policy: promise and performance. p 281-297 In D. Hulme and M.Murphree (eds). African wildlife and livelihoods: the Promise and performance of community conservation. James Currey Ltd. Oxford, United Kingdom.
Kramer, R. & C. VanSchaik. 1997. Preservation paradigms and tropical rain forests. p. 3-10. In R. Kramer, C. VanSchaik and J. Johnson (eds). Last stand: protected areas and the defense of tropical biodiversity. Oxford University, New York, New York, USA
LAPPA, 2011. La Asociación para la Protección de Psittacidoshttp (Disponible en : www.lappacr.org/es/links.php Consultado el 31 de enero de 2012)
Leach, M., R. Mearns, & I. Scoones. 1999. Environmental entitlements: dynamics and institutions in community-based natural resource management. World Development 27:225-247.
Margoluis, R. & N. Salafsky. 1998. Measures of success: designing, managing and monitoring conservation and development projects. Island, Washington, D.C., USA.
Marineros, L. & C. Vaughan. 1995. Scarlet Macaws of Carara. p. 445-468. In J. Abramson, B. Speer & J. Thomsen (eds).The large macaws: their care, breeding and conservation. Raintree, Fort Bragg, California, USA.
Nichter, M. 1984. Project community diagnosis: Participatory research as a first step toward community involvement in primary health care. Social Science & Medicine 19: 237-252
Salafsky, N., R. Margoluis, K. Redford & J. Robinson. 2002. Inedited. Improving the practice of conservation: a conceptual framework and agenda for conservation science.
Stiles, G. & A. Skutch. 1989. Birds of Costa Rica. Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
Umaña, A. & K. Brandon. 1992. Inventing institutions for conservation in Central America: lessons from Costa Rica. p. 85-106 In S. Annis (ed). Poverty, natural resources and public policy in Central America. Transaction, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Vargas, G. 1992. Cartografia, fitogeografia de la Reserva Biologica de Carara. San Jose: Universidad de Costa Rica, San Pedro, Costa Rica.
Vaughan, C. 1999. Do local communities in developing countries benefit from ecotourism in national parks and protected areas? Vida Silvestre Neotropical 8: 3-9.
Vaughan, C. 2002. Conservation strategies for a Scarlet Macaw (Ara macao) population in Costa Rica. PhD disseration, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
Vaughan, C. 2011. Change in dense forest habitat for endangered wildlife species in Costa Rica from 1940 to 1977. Cuadernos de Investigación 3: 15-77.
Vaughan, C. & J. Liske. 1991. Ecotourism and the Scarlet Macaw (Ara macao) population at Carara Biological Reserve, Costa Rica: A case for commensalism? p. 35-39 In J. Clinton-Eitniear (ed). Proceedings of the first Mesoamerican workshop on the conservation and management of macaws. Center for the Study of Tropical Birds, Austin, TX, USA.
Vaughan, C. & C. Rodriguez. 1997. Managing beyond the borders: The Costa Rican national system of conservation areas (SINAC). p. 441-451 In G. Meffe & C. Carroll (eds). Principles of Conservation Biology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
Vaughan, C., J. Gack, H. Solorzano & R. Ray. 2003a. The effect of environmental education on school children, their parents and community members: A study of intergenerational and intercommunity learning. Journal of Environmental Education.34: 12-21
Vaughan, C., N. Nemeth & L. Marineros. 2003b. Ecology and management of natural and artificial Scarlet Macaw (Ara macao) nest cavities in Costa Rica. Ornitología Neotropical. 14: 381-396
Vaughan, C., N. Nemeth, J. Cary & S. Temple. 2005. Response of a Scarlet Macaw (Ara macao) population to conservation measures. Birdlife International 15: 119-130
Vaughan, C., N. Nemeth & L. Marineros. 2006. Observations of Scarlet Macaw (Ara macao) diet in Central Pacific Costa Rica. International Journal of Tropical Biology and Conservation 54: 919-926.
Wells, M. 1994. Biodiversity conservation and local development aspirations: New priorities for the 1990s. p. 306-320 In C. Perrings, K. Maler and C. Holling (eds). Biodiversity conservation: problems and policies. Kluwer, Amsterdam, Holland
Wells, M. & K. Brandon. 1992. People and parks: linking protected area management with local communities. The World Bank. Washington, D.C., USA
Western, D. & R. Wright. 1994. The background to community-based conservation. p. 1-12. In D. Western, M. Wright & S. Strum (eds). Natural connections: perspectives in community-based conservation. Island, Washington, D.C., USA
Wiley, J., N. Snyder & R. Gnam. 1992. Reintroduction as a conservation strategy for parrots. p. 165-200. In S. Beissinger and N. Snyder (eds). New world parrots in crisis: solutions from conservation biology. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C, USA
Wright, T., Toft, C., Enkerlin-Hoeflich, E., Gonzalez-Elizondo, J., Albornoz, M., Rodriguez-Ferraro, A., Rojas-Suarez, F., Sanz, V., Trujillo, A., Beissinger, S., Berovides, V., Galvez, X., Brice, A., Joyner, K., Eberhard, J., Gilardi, J., Koenig, S., Stoleson, S., Martuscelli, P., Meyers, J., Renton, K., Rodriguez, A., Sosa-Asanza, A., Villela, F., & Wiley, J. 2001. Nest poaching in Neotropical parrots. Conservation Biology 15: 710-720
World Conservation Monitoring Center. 1992. Global biodiversity: status of the Earth’s living resources. Chapman and Hall. London, United Kingdom.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Note: This abstract contains an incorrect copyright due to technical issues. Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
All journal contents are freely available through a CC BY 4.0 license.
CC BY 4.0 is a Creative Commons: you can copy, modify, distribute, and perform, even for commercial reasons, without asking permission, if you give appropriate credit.
Contents can be reproduced if the source and copyright are acknowledged according to the Open Access license CC BY 4.0. Self-storage in preprint servers and repositories is allowed for all versions. We encourage authors to publish raw data and data logs in public repositories and to include the links with all drafts so that reviewers and readers can consult them at any time.
The journal is financed by public funds via Universidad Estatal a Distancia and editorial independence and ethical compliance are guaranteed by the Board of Editors, UNED. We do not publish paid ads or receive funds from companies.