Wildlife and feral dogs in a tropical wildlife refuge: complementary evidence from camera traps and active surveys

Authors

  • Nazareth Alfaro-Alfaro Universidad Técnica Nacional, Carrera Ingeniería en Ciencias Forestales y Vida Silvestre, sede de Atenas, Atenas, Alajuela, Costa Rica.
  • Lucía Isabel López-Umaña Universidad Técnica Nacional, Unidad de Ciencias Básicas, Sede Atenas, Atenas, Alajuela, Costa Rica. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0120-7981
  • Jose Manuel Mora Universidad Técnica Nacional, Carrera de Gestión Ecoturística, Sede Central, Alajuela, Costa Rica. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1200-1495

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22458/urj.v18i1.6592

Keywords:

animal ecology, geographical distribution, habitat fragmentation, interspecific interaction, introduced species, tropical forests

Abstract

 Introduction: In private protected areas, monitoring vertebrates and detecting feral domestic carnivores provide key information for conservation and management. Objective: To document the presence and composition of mammal and bird assemblages, as well as the presence of feral dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) and cats (Felis catus) at Los Cusingos Wildlife Refuge. Methods: We conducted the study from September 8 to November 4, 2024, using diurnal surveys along trails and gardens (active sampling) and camera traps (passive sampling). We installed eight cameras operating continuously for 24 hours in hybrid mode and considered records of the same species at the same camera independent when separated by more than 30 minutes. Feral dogs and cats were individually identified based on visible characteristics. Amphibians and reptiles were also recorded opportunistically. Results: We recorded 136 wildlife species: 97 birds, 26 mammals, 8 reptiles, and 5 amphibians. Camera traps produced 836 valid records corresponding to 53 species, whereas active observations recorded 87 bird species, 10 mammal species, 7 reptile species, and 5 amphibian species. We identified 31 feral dogs and one feral cat. Camera traps were more effective for characterizing mammal diversity, whereas active sampling was more effective for birds. Conclusion: Both methods were complementary, and their combined use provided a more comprehensive characterization of the refuge's fauna. The presence of numerous feral dogs represents a potential threat to native wildlife and requires management and monitoring strategies.

References

Acevedo, H. A., Arroyo, M., & Obando, V. (2016). Corredor Biológico Alexander Skutch: análisis de fragmentación y rutas de conectividad estructural. Agathos Natura. San José, Costa Rica.

Acuña-Prado, E., Molina-Jiménez, J. N., & Rodríguez-Vindas, S. (2017). Análisis de la estructura del paisaje en el Corredor Biológico Alexander Skutch, Pérez Zeledón, en los años 2005, 2012 y 2016 [Seminario de graduación de licenciatura, Universidad Nacional]. Repositorio Académico Institucional de la Universidad Nacional. https://repositorio.una.ac.cr/items/48e43168-fabb-48f0-9b17-8b88649c249b

Álvarez-Romero, J. G., Medellín, R. A., Oliveras de Ita, A., Gómez de Silva, H., & Sánchez, O. (2008). Animales exóticos en México: una amenaza para la biodiversidad. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad; Instituto de Ecología, UNAM; Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales.

Arauz-Beita, I., & Arias-Navarro, A. (2016). Corredores biológicos como potenciadores del desarrollo local: estudio de caso del Corredor Biológico Alexander Skutch. Universidad en Diálogo: Revista de Extensión, 6(1), 67–79. https://doi.org/10.15359/udre.6-1.4

Brower, J. E., Zar, J. H., & Von Ende, C. N. (1998). Field and laboratory methods for general ecology. (4th ed.). WCB McGraw Hill.

Centro Científico Tropical. (2022). Datos de la estación meteorológica ubicada en Los Cusingos, Quizarrá, Pérez Zeledón, Costa Rica [Base de datos no publicada]. Centro Científico Tropical.

Costanzi, L., Brambilla, A., Di Blasio, A., Dondo, A., Goria, M., Masoero, L., Gennero, M. S., & Bassano, B. (2021). Beware of dogs! Domestic animals as a threat for wildlife conservation in Alpine protected areas. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 67(4), 70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-021-01510-5

Gálvez, N., Infante, J., Fernandez, A., Díaz, J., & Petracca, L. (2021). Land use intensification coupled with free-roaming dogs as potential defaunation drivers of mesocarnivores in agricultural landscapes. Journal of Applied Ecology, 58(12), 2962–2974. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.14026

Hernández, C. M. (2010). Elaboración de una propuesta de plan de manejo para el Refugio de Aves Dr. Alexander Skutch “Los Cusingos” [Proyecto final de graduación, Universidad para la Cooperación Internacional]. Repositorio UCI. https://omeka.campusuci2.com/biblioteca/files/original/70524bca6fbd6b77333f059a61c9205e.pdf

Holdridge, L. R. (1967). Life zone ecology. Tropical Science Center.

Hughes, J., & Macdonald, D. W. (2013). A review of the interactions between free-roaming domestic dogs and wildlife. Biological Conservation, 157, 341–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.07.005

Joyce, F. H., Rosales, J. A., Holl, K. D., Zahawi, R. A., Bui, A., & Reid, J. L. (2024). Active restoration accelerates recovery of tropical forest bird assemblages over two decades. Biological Conservation, 293, 110593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110593

Latta, S. C., Brouwer, N. L., Olivieri, A., Girard-Woolley, J., & Richardson, J. F. (2017). Long-term monitoring reveals an avian species credit in secondary forest patches of Costa Rica. PeerJ, 5, e3539. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3539

Loss, S. R., Will, T., & Marra, P. P. (2013). The impact of free-ranging domestic cats on wildlife of the United States. Nature Communications, 4, 1396. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2380

Mejía, M. (2017). Refugio de aves Los Cusingos: la finca del eminente ornitólogo Dr. Alexander Skutch. Ambientico, 263, 36–39. https://www.ambientico.una.ac.cr/wp-content/uploads/tainacan-items/5/27753/263_36-39.pdf

Mora, J. M. (2025). Dice’s Cottontail Sylvilagus dicei Harris, 1932. En C. Lorenzo Monterrubio & J. M. Mora (Eds.) Mammals of Middle and South America: Lagomorpha. Handbook of the Mammals of Middle and South America (pp. 115–124). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31564-0_7-1

Mora, J. M., & López, L. I. (2026). Mamíferos de Costa Rica. Editorial Tecnológica.

Sasa, M., Chaves, G., & Porras, L. W. (2010). The Costa Rican herpetofauna: Conservation status and future perspectives. En L. D. Wilson, J. H. Townsend, & J. D. Johnson (Eds.), Conservation of Mesoamerican amphibians and reptiles (pp. 509–603). Eagle Mountain Publishing, LC.

Sistema Nacional de Áreas de Conservación. (2018). Diagnóstico del Corredor Biológico Alexander Skutch. Proyecto Implementación del Programa Nacional de Corredores Biológicos en el Marco de la Estrategia Nacional de Biodiversidad de Costa Rica SINAC/GIZ.

Stiles, F. G., & Skutch, A. F. (1989). A guide to the birds of Costa Rica. Cornell University Press.

Weber, M. (2010). Perros (Canis lupus familiaris) y gatos (Felis catus) ferales en la Reserva de la Biosfera Los Petenes, Campeche, México: diagnóstico, efectos en la fauna nativa y perspectivas de control [Informe final]. PNUD-CONANP-ECOSUR.

Wemmer, C., Kunz, T. H., Lundie-Jenkins, G., & McShea, W. J. (1996). Mammalian sign. En D. E. Wilson, F. R. Cole, J. D. Nichols, R. Rudran, & M. S. Foster (Eds.), Measuring and monitoring biological diversity: Standard methods for mammals (pp. 157–176). Smithsonian Institution Press.

Zamora-Nasca, L. B., Di Virgilio, A., & Lambertucci, S. A. (2021). Online survey suggests that dog attacks on wildlife affect many species and every ecoregion of Argentina. Biological Conservation, 256, 109041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109041

Published

2026-09-18

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Wildlife and feral dogs in a tropical wildlife refuge: complementary evidence from camera traps and active surveys. (2026). UNED Research Journal, 18(1), e6592. https://doi.org/10.22458/urj.v18i1.6592

Similar Articles

1-10 of 590

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.