Laboratorio de Experimentación Remota: Impacto en los trabajos finales de graduación en Ciencias Exactas y Naturales
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22458/rc.v27iEspecial.5272Keywords:
distance educationAbstract
Introduction: The Remote Experimentation Laboratory (REL) was established in 2018 in response to the Universidad Estatal a Distancia (UNED) need to strengthen the development of experimental activities within the distance education model. Objective: This study aims to analyze the scientific productivity that the Remote Experimentation Laboratory has contributed to the final graduation projects in the fields of exact and natural sciences from 2018 to the present. Methodology: A review was conducted on two master's theses and four undergraduate theses, applying an assessment methodology focused on research quality, with criteria such as credibility and internal validity, transferability, dependency-reliability, and objective conformability. Each criterion was evaluated based on specific dimensions and aspects
References
Arguedas Matarrita, C. (2017). Diseño y desarrollo de un Laboratorio Remoto para la enseñanza de la física en la UNED de Costa Rica. (Tesis doctoral). Universidad Nacional de Litoral, Santa Fe, Argentina.
García, M. (2020). Evaluating research quality: Methodologies and best practices. International Journal of Research Assessment, 15(3), 201-218.
Higgins, J. P., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2019). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. John Wiley & Sons.
Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS medicine, 2(8), e124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
Johnson, R., & Brown, A. (2019). Assessing the quality of research: A systematic approach. Research Evaluation, 28(2), 89-104.
Lincoln, Y. & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2019). Reproducibility and replicability in science. The National Academies Press.
Palacios Vicario, B., Sánchez Gómez, M.C., Gutiérrez García, A. (2013). Evaluar la calidad en la investigación cualitativa. Guías o checklists. En 2o Congreso Nacional sobre Metodología de la Investigación en Comunicación. Segovia, España
Peng, K. (2020). The importance of assessing research quality. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(4), 325-326. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0869-0
Pérez, R. (2009). Evaluación de la calidad de la investigación: el caso de la investigación cualitativa y su aporte para la construcción de un modelo general. En A. Marín y Ma. Eugenia Venegas (eds.). Investigación y formación. Teoría y práctica de la investigación educativa en la formación de educadores. Vol II. Manual de Posgrado. p. 67-78. San José: SIEDIN (Universidad de Costa Rica- Universidad de Salamanca).
Smith, J. (2018). The role of scientific research in advancing knowledge. Journal of Scientific Inquiry, 42(3), 127-142.
Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Ed. 2. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Thompson, L., Davis, S., & Wilson, K. (2021). Criteria for evaluating research quality: A comprehensive review. Journal of Research Methods, 52(4), 315-332.
