Icono

El contenido generado por IA puede ser incorrecto.UNED Research Journal. Vol. 17, JAN-DEC, 2025.
URL: 
https://revistas.uned.ac.cr/index.php/cuadernos/index
ISSN: 1659-441X
Licence: Creative Commons (BY) 4.0

 

Interfaz de usuario gráfica, Texto

El contenido generado por IA puede ser incorrecto.

 

Infectious agents in birds, and forest alteration in Northern Costa Rica

 

Kinndle Blanco-Peña1 Editorial: Nursing Education in the Emergence of COVID-19, Ana Eugenia Jiménez-Rocha2Editorial: Nursing Education in the Emergence of COVID-19, Gaby Dolz3Editorial: Nursing Education in the Emergence of COVID-19, Mónica Retamosa-Izaguirre4Editorial: Nursing Education in the Emergence of COVID-19


1.     Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica, Instituto Regional de Estudios en Sustancias Tóxicas, Heredia, Costa Rica; kblanco@una.ac.cr

2.     Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica, Laboratorio de Parasitología, Escuela de Medicina Veterinaria, Heredia, Costa Rica; ana.jimenez.rocha@una.ac.cr

3.     Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica, Laboratorio de Zoonosis y Entomología Escuela de Medicina Veterinaria, Heredia, Costa Rica; gaby.dolz.wiedner@una.ac.cr

4.     Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica, Instituto Internacional en Conservación y Manejo de Vida Silvestre, Heredia, Costa Rica; mretamos@una.ac.cr   

 

Received 17-III-2025 · Corrected 20-V-2025 · Accepted 26-V-2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22458/urj.v17i1.5722

 

ABSTRACT. Introduction: In Central America, forestry exploitation and agricultural expansion have raised concerns about biodiversity conservation, including bird diversity. Objective: To assess host-parasite relationships and habitat influence in birds and their ticks across forest fragments with varying degrees of alteration. Methods: From February 2008 to June 2010, we sampled nine forest fragments, classified by logging and agricultural use, at the Huetar Norte Conservation Area, Costa Rica. With mist nets we captured 838 birds and collected feces, blood, oropharyngeal and cloacal swabs, along with 555 ectoparasites from 407 birds. We analyzed samples using flotation technique, Hoyer, DNA and RNA extraction, and PCR. Results: The frequencies of endoparasites did not differ by level of forest alteration or agricultural use; only six Amblyomma spp. ticks were positive for Rickettsia spp. These were found in the non-harvested/low crop intensity, non-harvested/high crop intensity, and harvested/high crop intensity categories. No Anaplasma spp., Borrelia spp. or Chlamydia psittaci were found. Conclusion: These sites were similar regarding bird health status and pathogens. These results seem to support the dilution effect proposed for habitat fragmentation and transmission of infectious agents.

Keywords: bacteria, parasites, infectious diseases, tropics, avian diseases.

RESUMEN.Agentes infecciosos en aves y alteración del bosque en el norte de Costa Rica”. Introducción: En Centroamérica, la explotación forestal y la expansión agrícola han generado preocupación por la conservación de la biodiversidad, incluida la diversidad de aves. Objetivo: Evaluar las relaciones hospedero-parásito y la influencia del hábitat en aves y sus garrapatas en fragmentos de bosque con distintos grados de alteración. Métodos: Entre febrero de 2008 y junio de 2010, muestreamos nueve fragmentos de bosque, clasificados según el aprovechamiento forestal y el uso agrícola, en el Área de Conservación Huetar Norte, Costa Rica. Con redes de niebla capturamos 838 aves y recolectamos heces, sangre, hisopados orofaríngeos y cloacales, junto con 555 ectoparásitos de 407 aves. Analizamos las muestras mediante técnica flotación, medio de Hoyer, extracción de ADN y ARN, y PCR. Resultados: Las frecuencias de endoparásitos no difirieron según el nivel de alteración forestal o uso agrícola; solo seis garrapatas Amblyomma spp. tenían Rickettsia spp. Estas se encontraron en las categorías de no aprovechado/baja intensidad agrícola, no aprovechado/alta intensidad agrícola y aprovechado/alta intensidad agrícola. No detectamos Anaplasma spp., Borrelia spp. o Chlamydia psittaci. Conclusión: Estos sitios fueron similares en cuanto al estado de salud de las aves y la presencia de patógenos. Los resultados parecen apoyar el efecto de dilución propuesto para la fragmentación del hábitat y la transmisión de agentes infecciosos.

Palabras clave: bacterias, parásitos, enfermedades infecciosas, trópicos, enfermedades aviares.



 

INTRODUCTION

In Central America, large tracts of forest are suffering a drastic reduction due to the advance of the agricultural frontier and the expansion of human settlements (Kaimowitz, 1996), as well as the effects of activities related to mining and wood extraction (Fimbel et al., 2001). Costa Rica has an area of 1 152,150 ha for the sustainable production of wood, corresponding to the humid tropical forest and rainforest from the Huetar Norte, Atlántico and La Brunca regions (Chassot, 2006).  Here, a selective harvest scheme has been implemented, and legislation establishes a minimum of 15 years between harvests (Publicación No. 27388-MINAE, N° 212, 1998). This time allows a wood volume to recover to ensure long-term production, but little is known about whether this period is sufficient for the recovery of animal communities (Sánchez Núñez, 2009).

The compatibility between forest harvesting and biodiversity conservation has been questioned because forest logging can have direct or indirect adverse effects on the components and attributes of biodiversity (Putz et al., 2001). Forest harvesting directly alters the structure and composition of the forest and can cause fragmentation, resulting in a landscape with fewer and more isolated forest fragments (Mason & Thiollay, 2001). Forest products and by-products have disrupted the remaining forests, which could change bird communities and populations and their infectious agents (King et al., 2010). When resources, including food, are reduced in an area, birds may gather in larger flocks more often (Zhou et al., 2010), even close to farms, favoring the transmission of diseases between species. This can lead to disease outbreaks if suitable conditions for individual species  (Daszak et al., 2000).

This study aimed to compare the presence of ecto and endoparasites, Chlamydia psittaci, Borrelia spp., Anaplasma spp., and Rickettsia spp. in birds and their ticks inhabiting forest fragments with different degrees of alteration (with or without forest harvesting, and embedded in landscapes with different agriculture amount) in northern Costa Rica, to provide valuable data for understanding host-parasite relationships and the influence of habitat conditions on them. The results are interpreted in terms of national regulations about forest harvesting, providing information that can help improve harvesting schemes and habitat protection and developing preventive measures.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study area: The study was conducted in the Northern Huetar Conservation Area of Costa Rica from February 2008 to June 2010. We selected nine forest units according to their degree of alteration, defined by the type of forest management in each forest unit (two classes, harvested or non-harvested) and the amount of agriculture in 500ha area surrounding each forest unit (2 classes, high or low crop intensity). Harvested forests were operated by the Commission on Sustainable Forestry Development of San Carlos (CODEFORSA) in the early 90’s and have not been harvested between then and the date of this study. Therefore, these forests have undergone approximately 20 years of natural recovery at the time of this study. Non-harvested forests are some of the few remaining preserved forests in the area and have never been harvested.

 

We created a hexagonal grid and overlaid it on land use and cover to calculate the agricultural area in each 500ha cell. So, each hexagon covered 500 hectares and included both the forest fragment and its surrounding matrix. This spatial configuration ensured uniform sampling units and reduced edge effects commonly associated with square grids. The study area was then classified according to the agricultural amount in each hexagon cell to visually examine the distribution of agricultural lands (ESRI, 2009). We used this information to select forest units for sampling in zones with either high or low crop intensity as an additional criterion to the type of forest management. Consequently, we selected both harvested and non-harvested forest units in areas with high crop intensity or low crop intensity. We run variance models in R to corroborate the difference in the amount of agriculture surrounding forest units (R Core Team, 2013).  Mean agriculture field was more extensive in an area of 500ha surrounding forest units allocated to "high crop intensity" class (171.39ha; 95%: 83.04 - 259.74ha) than "low crop intensity" class (49.09ha; 95%: 32.65 - 80.86ha) classes (F=11.46, P= 0.0117). As a result, we considered four harvested forests and five non-harvested forests. Besides, five of these forests belonged to the low crop intensity class and four to the high crop intensity (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Study sites classified according to forest harvesting and fragmentation in the Northern Huetar Conservation Area of Costa Rica.

 

Bird sampling: We placed eight mist nets (12 x 2.5m and 32mm) along transects spaced 100m apart in each one of the nine sampling sites from February 2008 to June 2010. They were checked for netted birds at 30-min intervals from 5:30 am until 10:30 am. Each mist-netting session lasted one week. Captured birds were identified by species, banded, and visually examined for body condition, ectoparasites, and lesions. Ectoparasites from feathers were picked off and stored in ethanol 70%. Feces, blood samples, and oropharyngeal and cloacal swabs were collected from some birds (Table 1). Samples were stored at 4 °C in the forest and promptly transported to the Veterinary School of the Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica, where they were kept at -20°C. Recaptured individuals were released immediately.

 

TABLE 1

Samples collected and analyzed to determine infectious agents

Target of Analysis

Sample Type

Number of Samples or Individuals

Ectoparasites

Mites, lice, and ticks (nymphs, larvae, and adults)

555 ectoparasites (409 mites, 25 lice, and 121 ticks) from 407 birds

Endoparasites

Feces

147

Chlamydia spp.

Cloacal and oropharyngeal swabs

221 and 225, respectively

Rickettsia spp., Anaplasma spp., and Borrelia spp.

Ticks

121

 

Parasitological analysis: We collected feathers from a subsample of 407 birds on which ectoparasites were visible when they were handled. Feathers were examined for mites, lice, and ticks (nymphs, larvae, and adults). Mites, lice, and ticks were mounted on Hoyer medium. The feces were analyzed using the flotation technique with a hyper-saturated sugar solution. The taxonomic identification of ectoparasites was carried out at the genus level (Atyeo & Braasch, 1966; Clay, 1953; Mironov, 1985; Nava et al., 2017; Orwig, 1968; Park & Atyeo, 1971). Likewise, the endoparasites were also classified at the genus level, except for one group classified at the order level (Larki et al., 2018; Tenter et al., 2002; Yamaouti, 1961). The number of positives for each parasite type was recorded. 

Molecular analysis: We analyzed oral and cloacal swabs for Chlamydia spp., while ticks were analyzed for Rickettsia spp., Anaplasma spp., and Borrelia spp. According to the manufacturer's instructions, DNA extraction from swabs and ticks were performed using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (QIAGEN, Chatsworth, CA, USA). A set of already published primers was selected to identify bacterial species (Table 2). The following positive controls were used: DNA of C. psittaci, donated by the Clinic of Birds, Reptiles, Amphibians and Fish, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany; DNA of A. phagocytophilum (strain Trestom) HL-60 infected cells, donated by the CDC Atlanta, USA; DNA of Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. donated by the Center for Biomedical Research of La Rioja, Spain, and  DNA from R. felis. All PCR experiments included water (Fermentas®) used as a negative control. Reactions were performed with Dream Taq PCR Master Mix 2X (Fermentas), primers (0.1𝜇M), DNA (20𝜇g), and water (molecular biology grade, Fermentas). PCR products were visualized by agarose gel electrophoresis (1.4%) in TBE (Tris Base, boric acid, EDTA, pH8, 0.5 M), and ethidium bromide staining (0.5g/ml). GeneRuler 100 bp DNA Ladder Plus (Sm0321, Fermentas®) was used for DNA sizing.

TABLE 2

Protocols used for determining infectious agents

 

Pathogen

Protocol

Primer Name

Sequences (5´-3')

Chlamydia spp.

(Kaltenboeck et al., 1991)

191CHOMP

CHOMP371

GCIYTITGGGARTGYGGITGYGCI AC

TTAGAAIC[GT]GAATTGIGC[AG][TC]IA GTGIGCIGCTT

Rickettsia spp.

(Labruna et al., 2004)

CS-78

CS-323

GCAAGTATCGGTGAGGATGTAAT  GCTTCCTTAAAATTCAATAAATCAGGAT

(Regnery et al., 1991)

Rr190.70p

Rr190.602n

ATGGCGAATATTTCTCCAAAA

AGTGCAGCATTCGCTCCCCCT

Anaplasma spp.

(Alberti et al., 2005)

EphplgroEL (569)

EphplgroEL (1193)

ATGGTATGCAGTTTGATCGC

TCTACTCTGTCTTTGCGTTC

A. phagocytophilum

(Massung et al., 1998)

Ge3a

Ge10r

Ge9f

Ge2

CACATGCAAGTCGAACGGATTATTC

TTCCGTTAAGAAGGATCTAATCTCC

AACGGATTATTCTTTATAGCTTGCT

GGCAGTATTAAAAGCAGCTCCAGG

Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato

(Rijpkema et al., 1995)

23SN1

23SC1

23SN2

5SCB

ACCATAGACTCTTATTACTTTGAC

TAAGCTGACTAATACTAATTACCC

ACCATAGACTCTTATTACTTTGACCA

GAGAGTAGGTTATTGCCAGGG

Note: derived from research.

 

Genomic DNA was extracted from tick pools with Blood and Tissue kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer`s instructions. PCRs protocols for rickettsial agents were detailed in a previous report (Dolz et al., 2019).

Statistical analysis: We conducted statistical analyses in R (R Core Team 2013). We used analysis of variance (ANOVA) models to compare the number of bird species, total number of individuals, and the Shannon diversity index across two categorical factors: harvest condition (harvested vs. non-harvested) and agricultural intensity (high vs. low). For more complex relationships, we fitted generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs). These models included harvest condition and habitat fragmentation class as fixed effects, while the site was included as a random effect to account for repeated measures or spatial clustering. Response variables in GLMMs included bird richness, abundance, and Shannon index, using appropriate distributions (e.g., Poisson or Gaussian) according to the nature of each variable. Additionally, to assess the relationship between ectoparasite load and land-use factors, we constructed separate generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) with ectoparasite presence or counts as the response variable, and harvest condition and agricultural intensity as fixed effects, with site again treated as a random effect. We also examined model residuals to ensure that the assumptions of normality and homoscedasticity were met, and we selected the final models based on AIC values.

RESULTS

We captured 838 birds from 76 spp. 460 birds from 58 species belonged to non-harvested sites, and 378 birds from 50 species to harvested sites. Although non-harvested sites presented a higher number of bird species and a higher number of individuals than harvested sites, these differences were not statistically significant (F=2.322, P= 0.171, and F=0.064, P= 0.808, respectively). In addition, 460 birds from 59 species belonged to sites with less agriculture, and 378 birds from 47 species to sites with high crop intensity. Although units with low crop intensity presented a higher number of bird species and more individuals than units with high crop intensity, these differences were also not statistically significant (F=0.002, P= 0.969, and F= 0.064, P= 0.808, respectively). On the other hand, the Shannon diversity index was higher in harvested than in non-harvested sites and in units with low crop intensity than in units with high crop intensity. However, these differences were not statistically significant (F= 2.893, P= 0.133, and F= 0.027, P= 0.875, respectively) either.

A total of 555 ectoparasites (409 mites, 25 lice, and 121 ticks) were collected from 407 birds. Percentages of infection (PI) of 4.2% (17/407), 59.5% (242/407), 18.0% (73/407), and 9.1% (37/407) were established for the mites of the Analges, Pterodectes, Proctophyllodes, and Trouessartia genera, respectively; while PI of 6.1% (25/407) for Rallicola lice, and 12.5% (51/407) for Amblyomma ticks were determined. Only Amblyomma spp. larvae and nymphs were collected on 47 birds. A higher proportion of Proctophyllodes sp. was found in non-harvested sites (Z= -0.0081081, p-value <0.05). According to the amount of agriculture, Analges spp. (Z = -0.027027, p-value <0.05) and Pterodectes spp. (Z=-0.250614, p-value <0.05) presented a higher proportion in units with low crop intensity. However, Trouessartia spp. (Z=0.056511, p-value <0.05) and Amblyomma spp. (Z= 0.066339, p-value <0.05) showed a higher proportion in units with high crop intensity (Table 3).

 

TABLE 3

Avian ectoparasites in nine forest sites from the Northern Huetar Area in Costa Rica

Forest

Percentage of birds infected

Mites

Lice

Ticks

Analges spp.

Pterodectes spp.

Proctophyllodes spp.

Trouessartia spp.

Rallicola spp.

Amblyomma spp.

Harvested

2.2

(9/407)

30.7

(125/407)

4.9

(20/407)

8.4

(34/407)

3.2

(13/407)

5.7

(23/407)

Non harvested

2

(8/407)

28.7

(117/407)

13

(53/407)

3.2

(13/407)

2.9

(12/407)

6.9

(28/407)

Total

4.2

(17/407)

59.5

(242/407)

18

(73/407)

9.1

(37/407)

6.1

(25/407)

12.5

(51/407)

High crop intensity

0.7

(3/407)

17.2

(70/407)

8.6

(35/407)

8.6

(35/407)

3.2

(13/407)

9.6

(39/407)

Low crop intensity

3.4

(14/407)

42.3

(172/407)

9.3

(38/407)

2.9

(12/407)

2.9

(12/407)

2.9

(12/407)

Total

4.2

(17/407)

59.5

(242/407)

18

(73/407)

9.1

(37/407)

6.1

(25/407)

12.5

(51/407)

 

Of the total of the fecal samples 11.6% (17/147) were positive for endoparasites. Coccidia (Eimeria spp. and Isospora spp.) were the most frequent protozoan found in fecal samples (9.5%), while nematodes such as Strongylida and Echinuria spp. were only slightly represented. The frequencies of endoparasites were not significantly different between harvest or fragmentation groups (Table 4).

            

TABLE 4

Percentage of avian endoparasites found in feces in nine forest sites from the Northern Huetar Area in Costa Rica.

Forest

Coccidia

 

Strongylida

Equinuria spp.

Harvested

3.4 (5/147*)

 

0.7 (1/147)

0.7 (1/147)

Non harvested

6.1 (9/147)

 

0.7 (1/147)

0 (0/147)

Total

9.5 (14/147)

 

1.4 (2/147)

0.7 (1/147)

High crop intensity

5.4 (8/147)

 

0 (0/147)

0.7 (1/147)

Low crop intensity

4 (6/147)

 

1.4 (2/147)

0 (0/147)

Total

9.5 (14/147)

 

1.4 (2/147)

0.7 (1/147)

*Total of birds from which feces were obtained

 

A total of six Amblyomma spp. ticks were positive for Rickettsia spp. These positive cases were found in the non-harvested/low crop intensity, non-harvested/high crop intensity, and harvested/high crop intensity categories. All the birds belonged to the order Passeriformes and fed on insects from the understory of humid forests, including old-growth secondary forests (Table 5). On the other hand, ticks were negative for Anaplasma spp. and Borrelia spp. Neither the 221 oropharyngeal samples nor the 225 cloacal samples collected from birds were positive for C. psittaci.

 

TABLE 5

Description of bird species with Rickettsia spp. positive ticks.

Forest sites

Type of site

Bird species

Bird family

Migration status

Conservation status

Food

habits

Golfito

Harvested/ High crop intensity

Attila spadiceus

 

 

 

 

Catharus ustulatus

Tyrannidae

 

 

 

 

Turdidae

Resident

 

 

 

 

Migratory

Low concern

Insects, spiders, small frogs, lizards, berries and seeds

Fruits, seeds, some insects and invertebrates

Santa Helena

Non-harvested/ High crop intensity

Dendrocincla fuliginosa

Furnariidae

Resident

Low concern

Insects and spiders

Chacha-lacas

Non-harvested/ Low crop intensity

 

Glyphorhynchus spirurus

Thamnophilus atrinucha

 

Phaenostictus mcleannani

Furnariidae

 

Thamnophilidae

 

Thamnophilidae

Residents

ND

 

Low concern

 

 

Low concern

Insects and spiders

Insects, spiders, and lizards

Insects, spiders, scorpions, other invertebrates and small vertebrates

 

Note: Mixed generalized linear model results are included as supplementary data.

 

DISCUSSION

Habitat loss and fragmentation are among the primary causes of biodiversity loss, increasing the risk of species extinction (Fahrig, 2003). Forest harvesting has been related to changes in the components and attributes of biodiversity (Putz et al., 2001), which are conditioned by factors such as the ecological requirements of the species (Woltmann, 2000), the intensity of harvesting (Mason, 1996), and logging schemes and techniques (Bawa & Seidler, 1998).

In Costa Rica, a selective harvesting scheme has been implemented, and legislation establishes a minimum of 15 years between harvests. One study in northern Costa Rica forest fragments found that the estimated richness of birds and number of individuals per trophic guild showed no significant differences between harvested (16 years previous to the study) and non-harvested forests (Sánchez Núñez, 2009). However, these parameters tended to be higher in non-harvested forests. Nevertheless, species composition varied between forests: non-harvested forests had more species of hummingbirds, nuthatches, antbirds, and psittacine than harvested forests. Species occurrence for all trophic guilds differed between non-harvested and harvested forests, with this parameter tending to be greater in non-harvested forests. Sánchez Núñez (2009) stated that these harvested forests seemed to be recovering after harvesting, although more research was needed to ensure sufficient time for a total recovery of bird communities after forest harvesting. Similarities found in this study in the number of bird species, total number of individuals, and Shannon diversity indices between harvest or fragmentation classes seem to agree with those found by Sánchez Núñez (2009). 

Concerning parasite infection of birds in northern Costa Rica, mites were the most common ectoparasites found in this study, similar to previous reports (Enout et al., 2012). However, we found a low percentage of chewing lice. In Costa Rica, Rallicola ochrolaemi, R. fuliginosa, and R. cephalosa were reported previously in bird species such as Automolus ochrolaemus, Dendrocincla fuliginosa, and Glyphorynchus spirurus (Sychra et al., 2007). On the other hand, we found a higher tick infestation rate of birds (12.5%) than the 7% reported by other authors in different wild birds in seven protected areas on the Caribbean and Pacific slopes of Costa Rica (Ogrzewalska et al., 2015). A low percentage of coccidian parasites was found, while other studies have reported Eimeria and Isospora as common and occasional (Cole & Friend, 1999). Time of day, age, and feeding habits affect coccidian oocyst shedding in wild passerines, with more of these parasites found in the afternoon (López et al., 2007). However, these captures were carried out in the morning. It is also possible that physiological differences in feeding habits between species could have affected these results (Boughton, 1933; Dolnik, 1999a, 1999b). Additionally, gastrointestinal parasites are not excreted constantly, and the use of a single fecal sample per bird may have limited the detection of these parasites; serial sampling would have been ideal but was not feasible under the conditions of this field study.

Six ticks (Amblyomma spp.), found in six different birds, were positive for Rickettsia amblyommatis. These ticks were found in three forest sites: two in forests surrounded by high crop intensity areas and one in a forest surrounded by low crop intensity areas. Other researchers have proposed that a higher prevalence of ectoparasites (in this case, ticks) on birds in fragmented areas of Brazil might be caused by the dominance of a few generalist bird species in small patches, allowing easier transmission of parasites among individuals (Ogrzewalska et al., 2011).  In addition, in more fragmented areas, we might expect a more heterogeneous landscape, with forest fragments interspersed with other classes of land use, for example, pastures for cattle or other productive uses. This might, in turn, maximize contact not only among individuals of wildlife species in forest fragments but even between wildlife and domestic animals living in the matrix surrounding forest fragments. This scenario may increase access to cattle and cattle ticks (Tolesano-Pascoli et al., 2010), which is relevant considering all avian species with Rickettsia spp. positive ticks usually visit the ground to seek food or collect material to build nests (Sick, 1997).

A non-expected pattern was found in the case of ectoparasite infection and Rickettsia spp. positives in areas with or without forest harvesting; two of the three forest sites with ticks positive for Rickettsia spp. were found in non-harvested sites and one in a harvested site (harvested at least 15 years before sampling). It might be expected that birds inhabiting forests subjected to disturbances by logging would be more stressed or have lower immune defenses (Klukowski & Nelson, 2001; Tieleman et al., 2005), which might, in turn, affect their parasite load and lead to increased prevalence of a disease agent in the environment (Deem et al., 2001; Patz et al., 2000).

In addition, according to the dilution effect, we might expect a higher proportion of parasites in more disturbed and possibly less diverse forests, such as harvested areas (Ostfeld & Keesing, 2000). However, a higher proportion of Proctophyllodes sp. in non-harvested forests was found. Moreover, a higher diversity of birds was found in the harvested forest than in the non-harvested forest, although this difference was not statistically significant. However, the intermediate disturbance hypothesis may be considered here – a mechanism proposed by Connell (1978), to explain the maintenance of diversity in tropical forests and coral reefs. This hypothesis states that intermediate disturbance in mature ecosystems maintains higher levels of species richness and biodiversity than in the absence of such disturbances (Roxburgh et al., 2004). The similarity of bird richness and diversity among forest sites, and the absence of disease agents in birds found in this study, may account for a tendency towards recovery taking place in bird communities of harvested forests from northern Costa Rica, given the selective forest harvesting scheme and the period between harvests (16 years) applied to these forests. However, it is necessary to identify consequences in the birds' health when forests are harvested and in the first years following that harvesting.

The other infectious agents (Anaplasma spp. and Borrelia spp.) analyzed in ticks were negative in this study. In Europe, Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. was found and transmitted, especially by Ixodes ricinus ticks (Gern et al., 1998), which are reported in the highlands of Costa Rica (Ogrzewalska et al., 2015). We also obtained negative results for chlamydiosis in birds. Studies around the world on chlamydiosis in Passeriformes are not common, mainly because they are not considered to play an important role in the transmission of the bacteria (Kaleta & Taday, 2003). However, a few studies have reported these species as carriers of the bacterium (Olsen et al., 1998; Rehn et al., 2013; Simpson & Bevan, 1989).

In general, the bird communities analyzed in this study might be diverse enough to dilute the probability of the presence of most of the infectious agents analyzed, consistent with the dilution effect (Ostfeld & Keesing, 2000). These authors suggested that habitat loss and fragmentation can contribute to disease outbreaks indirectly through the loss of biodiversity while maintaining high biodiversity might decrease the prevalence of an infectious disease among hosts due to the dilution effect. It is also possible that the avian communities in this study were similar because they were in a similar and relatively small landscape, probably shaped by the same biophysical factors and human productive activities. Future studies that consider a larger number of forest sites in areas showing much larger differences in forest size and fragmentation may provide further insights into the effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on disease ecology.

These results seem to support the dilution effect proposed for the effects of habitat fragmentation on disease transmission. However, the forest sites analyzed were similar in terms of health status and the presence of disease agents in birds. This may reflect a possible tendency towards recovery in the harvested forests studied or a strong similarity among forest sites because of their closeness in a generally similar landscape.

 

 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Vicerrectoría de Investigación, Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica, for the translation of this manuscript; Área de Conservación Huetar Norte, that granted research permits for this study; Angie Sánchez Núñez and Carol Sánchez Núñez, who significantly contributed to data collection and analysis, and the support given by all the farm owners who provided us access to their properties. This work was supported by the Fondo de Educación Estatal Superior (FEES) from the Consejo Nacional de Rectores de Costa Rica (CONARE).

 

 

ETHICS, CONFLICT OF INTEREST, AND FUNDING STATEMENT

The authors declare that we have fully complied with all pertinent ethical and legal requirements, both during the study and in the production of the manuscript; that there are no conflicts of interest of any kind; that all financial sources are fully and clearly stated in the acknowledgements section; and that they fully agree with the final edited version of the article. A signed document has been filed in the journal archives.

The statement of each author’s contribution to the manuscript is as follows: All co-authors: Study design. K.B.P., A.E.J.R., and G.D.: Laboratory analysis. M.R.I.: Data collection and analysis. All co-authors: preparation and final approval of the manuscript.


REFERENCES

Alberti, A., Addis, M. F., Sparagano, O., Zobba, R., Chessa, B., Cubeddu, T., Parpaglia, M. L. P., Ardu, M., & Pittau, M. (2005). Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Sardinia, Italy. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 11(8), 1322–1324. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1108.050085

 

Atyeo, W., & Braasch, N. (1966). The Feather Mite Genus Proctophyllodes (Sarcoptiformes: Proctopbyllodidae). Bulletin of the University of Nebraska State Museum. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/museumbulletin/39

 

Bawa, K. S., & Seidler, R. (1998). Natural forest management and conservation of biodiversity in tropical forests. Conservation biology, 12(1), 46–55.

 

Boughton, D. C. (1933). DIURNAL GAMETIC PERIODICITY IN AVIAN ISOSPORA. American Journal of Epidemiology, 18, 161–184. http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/content/18/1/161.extract

 

Chassot, O. (2006). Biología de la conservacion de la Lapa Verde (1994-2006): 12 años de experiencia = 12 years of conservation biology of the great green macaw 1994- 2006. Centro Cientifico Tropical.

 

Clay, T. (1953). Revisions of the genera of Mallophaga—I. The Rallicola-complex. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 123, 563–587. http://phthiraptera.info/sites/phthiraptera.info/files/38919.pdf

 

Cole, R. A., & Friend, M. (1999). Parasites and Parisitic Diseases (Field Manual of Wildlife Diseases). Other Publications in Zoonotics and Wildlife Disease, Paper 15, 188–258.

 

Connell, J. H. (1978). Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science (New York, N.Y.), 199(4335), 1302–1310. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.199.4335.1302

 

Daszak, P., Cunningham, A. A., & Hyatt, A. D. (2000). Emerging infectious diseases of wildlife–threats to biodiversity and human health. science, 287(5452), 443–449. http://science.sciencemag.org/content/287/5452/443.short

 

Deem, S. L., Karesh, W. B., & Weisman, W. (2001). Putting Theory into Practice: Wildlife Health in Conservation. Conservation Biology, 15(5), 1224–1233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2001.00336.x

 

Dobson, A. P., & May, R. M. (1986). Disease and conservation. En M. E. Soulé (Ed.), Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity (pp. 345–365). Sinauer Associates.

 

Dolnik, O. V. (1999a). Diurnal oocyst periodicity in Isospora dilatata (Sporozoa, Eimeriidae) from the common starling (Sturnus Vulgaris) in nature. Parasitologiya, 33(1), 74–80.

 

Dolnik, O. V. (1999b). Diurnal periodicity in appearance of Isospora (Protozoa: Coccidea) oocysts from some passerine birds. Proc. Zool. Inst. RAS, 281, 113–118.

 

Dolz, G., Castro, R., Jiménez-Rocha, A. E., Retamosa, M., & Alberti, A. (2019). Strain diversity of Rickettsia amblyommatis in ticks infesting birds in the North Huetar conservation area of Costa Rica. Ticks and Tick-Borne Diseases, 10(5), 1109–1112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2019.06.007

 

Enout, A. M. J., Lobato, D. N. C., Diniz, F. C., & Antonini, Y. (2012). Chewing lice (Insecta, Phthiraptera) and feather mites (Acari, Astigmata) associated with birds of the Cerrado in Central Brazil. Parasitology Research, 111(4), 1731–1742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-012-3016-5

 

ESRI. (2009). ArcGIS®9.3 Geocoding Technology (Versión 9.3) [Software]. ESRI. www.esri.com

 

Fahrig, L. (2003). Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on Biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 34(1), 487–515. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132419

 

Fimbel, R. A., Grajal, A., & Robinson, J. G. (Eds.). (2001). The Cutting Edge: Conserving Wildlife in Logged Tropical Forests. Columbia University Press; JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.7312/fimb11454

 

Gern, L., Estrada-Peña, A., Frandsen, F., Gray, J. S., Jaenson, T. G. T., Jongejan, F., Kahl, O., Korenberg, E., Mehl, R., & Nuttall, P. A. (1998). European Reservoir Hosts of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato. Zentralblatt Für Bakteriologie: Medical Microbiology, Virology, Parasitology, Infectious Diseases, 287(3), 196–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0934-8840(98)80121-7

 

Kaimowitz, D. (1996). Livestock and Deforestation in Central America in the 1980s and 1990s: A Policy Perspective. CIFOR.

 

Kaleta, E. F., & Taday, E. M. A. (2003). Avian host range of Chlamydophila spp. Based on isolation, antigen detection and serology. Avian Pathology: Journal of the W.V.P.A, 32(5), 435–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079450310001593613

 

Kaltenboeck, B., Kousoulas, K. G., & Storz, J. (1991). Detection and strain differentiation of Chlamydia psittaci mediated by a two-step polymerase chain reaction. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 29(9), 1969–1975.

 

King, K. C., Daniel Mclaughlin, J., Boily, M., & Marcogliese, D. J. (2010). Effects of agricultural landscape and pesticides on parasitism in native bullfrogs. Biological Conservation, 143(2), 302–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.10.011

 

Klukowski, M., & Nelson, C. E. (2001). Ectoparasite Loads in Free-Ranging Northern Fence Lizards, Sceloporus undulatus hyacinthinus: Effects of Testosterone and Sex. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 49(4), 289–295. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4601889

 

Labruna, M. B., Whitworth, T., Horta, M. C., Bouyer, D. H., McBride, J. W., Pinter, A., Popov, V., Gennari, S. M., & Walker, D. H. (2004). Rickettsia species infecting Amblyomma cooperi ticks from an area in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, where Brazilian spotted fever is endemic. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 42(1), 90–98.

 

Larki, S., Alborzi, A., Chegini, R., & Amiri, R. (2018). A Preliminary Survey on Gastrointestinal Parasites of Domestic Ducks in Ahvaz, Southwest Iran. Iranian Journal of Parasitology, 13(1), 137–144.

 

López, G., Figuerola, J., & Soriguer, R. (2007). Time of day, age and feeding habits influence coccidian oocyst shedding in wild passerines. International Journal for Parasitology, 37(5), 559–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2006.12.014

 

Mason, D. (1996). Responses of Venezuelan Understory Birds to Selective Logging, Enrichment Strips, and Vine Cutting. Biotropica, 28(3), 296–309. https://doi.org/10.2307/2389194

 

Mason, D. J., & Thiollay, J. (2001). En R. A. Fimbel, A. Grajal, & J. G. Robinson (Eds.), The Cutting Edge: Conserving Wildlife in Logged Tropical Forest. Columbia University Press.

 

Massung, R. F., Slater, K., Owens, J. H., Nicholson, W. L., Mather, T. N., Solberg, V. B., & Olson, J. G. (1998). Nested PCR Assay for Detection of Granulocytic Ehrlichiae. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 36(4), 1090–1095. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC104695/

 

Mironov, S. V. (1985). Feather mites of the genera Analges and Pteronyssoides from the European part of the USSR (Sarcoptiformes, Analgoidea)]. Parazitologicheskii Sbornik, 33, 159–208.

 

Nava, S., Venzal, J. M., González-Acuña, D., Martins, T. F., & Guglielmone, A. A. (2017). Chapter 4—Morphological Keys for Genera and Species of Ixodidae and Argasidae. En S. Nava, J. M. Venzal, D. González-Acuña, T. F. Martins, & A. A. Guglielmone (Eds.), Ticks of the Southern Cone of America (pp. 323–336). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811075-1.00004-2

 

Ogrzewalska, M., Literák, I., Capek, M., Sychra, O., Calderón, V. Á., Rodríguez, B. C., Prudencio, C., Martins, T. F., & Labruna, M. B. (2015). Bacteria of the genus Rickettsia in ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) collected from birds in Costa Rica. Ticks and Tick-Borne Diseases, 6(4), 478–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2015.03.016

 

Ogrzewalska, M., Uezu, A., Jenkins, C. N., & Labruna, M. B. (2011). Effect of Forest Fragmentation on Tick Infestations of Birds and Tick Infection Rates by Rickettsia in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. EcoHealth, 8(3), 320–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-011-0726-6

 

Olsen, B., Persson, K., & Broholm, K. A. (1998). PCR detection of Chlamydia psittaci in faecal samples from passerine birds in Sweden. Epidemiology and Infection, 121(2), 481–484. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2809549/

 

Orwig, K. (1968). The Genera and Species of the Feather Mite Subfamily Trouessartinae except Trouessartia (Acarina: Proctophyllodidae). Bulletin of the University of Nebraska State Museum, 8, 1–179. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/museumbulletin/110

 

Ostfeld, R. S., & Keesing, F. (2000). Biodiversity and Disease Risk: The Case of Lyme Disease. Conservation Biology, 14(3), 722–728.

 

Park, C., & Atyeo, W. (1971). A Generic Revision of the Pterodedinae, a New Subfamily of Feather Mites (Sarcoptiformes: Analgoidea). Bulletin of the University of Nebraska State Museum, 9(3), 39–88. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/museumbulletin/108

 

Patz, J. A., Graczyk, T. K., Geller, N., & Vittor, A. Y. (2000). Effects of environmental change on emerging parasitic diseases. International Journal for Parasitology, 30(12–13), 1395–1405.

Ministerio de Agricultura y Ganadería (1998). Principios, criterios e indicadores de manejo forestal y certificación (Publicación No. 27388-MINAE, N° 212). Recuperado de http://www.mag.go.cr/legislacion/1998/de-27388.pdf

 

Putz, F. E., Blate, G. M., Redford, K. H., Fimbel, R., & Robinson, J. (2001). Tropical Forest Management and Conservation of Biodiversity: An Overview. Conservation Biology, 15(1), 7–20.

 

R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/

 

Regnery, R. L., Spruill, C. L., & Plikaytis, B. D. (1991). Genotypic identification of rickettsiae and estimation of intraspecies sequence divergence for portions of two rickettsial genes. Journal of Bacteriology, 173(5), 1576–1589. http://jb.asm.org/content/173/5/1576

 

Rehn, M., Ringberg, H., Runehagen, A., Herrmann, B., Olsen, B., Petersson, A. C., Hjertqvist, M., Kühlmann-Berenzon, S., & Wallensten, A. (2013). Unusual increase of psittacosis in southern Sweden linked to wild bird exposure, January to April 2013. Euro Surveillance: Bulletin Européen Sur Les Maladies Transmissibles = European Communicable Disease Bulletin, 18(19), 20478.

 

Rijpkema, S. G., Molkenboer, M. J., Schouls, L. M., Jongejan, F., & Schellekens, J. F. (1995). Simultaneous detection and genotyping of three genomic groups of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in Dutch Ixodes ricinus ticks by characterization of the amplified intergenic spacer region between 5S and 23S rRNA genes. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 33(12), 3091–3095.

 

Roxburgh, S. H., Shea, K., & Wilson, J. B. (2004). The Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis: Patch Dynamics and Mechanisms of Species Coexistence. Ecology, 85(2), 359–371.

 

Sánchez Núñez, A. (2009). Ensamble y ocurrencia de aves en bosques sometidos a manejo forestal, Región Huetar Norte, Costa Rica. Tesis  -- Universidad Nacional, Heredia.

 

Sick, H. (1997). Ornitologia Brasileira—Helmut Sick 2ed-01. Editora Nova Fronteira. https://es.scribd.com/doc/100102495/Ornitologia-Brasileira-Helmut-Sick-2ed-01

 

Simpson, V. R., & Bevan, R. (1989). Chlamydia psittaci infection in robins. The Veterinary Record, 125(21), 537.

 

Sychra, O., Literák, I., Capek, M., & Havlícek, M. (2007). Chewing Lice (Phthiraptera) From Ovenbirds, Leaftossers and Woodcreepers (Passeriformes: Furnariidae: Furnariinae, Sclerurinae, Dendrocolaptinae) from Costa Rica, With Descriptions of Four New Species of the Genera Rallicola and Myrsidea. Caribbean Journal of Science, 43(1), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.18475/cjos.v43i1.a11

 

Tenter, A. M., Barta, J. R., Beveridge, I., Duszynski, D. W., Mehlhorn, H., Morrison, D. A., Andrew Thompson, R. C., & Conrad, P. A. (2002). The conceptual basis for a new classification of the coccidia. ASP Special, 32(5), 595–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7519(02)00021-8

 

Tieleman, B. I., Williams, J. B., Ricklefs, R. E., & Klasing, K. C. (2005). Constitutive innate immunity is a component of the pace-of-life syndrome in tropical birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 272(1573), 1715–1720. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2005.3155

 

Woltmann, S. (2000). Comunidades de aves del bosque en áreas alteradas y no alteradas de la concesión forestal La Chonta, Santa Cruz, Bolivia. Documento Técnico, 92, 2000.

 

Yamaouti, S. (1961). Systema Helnrinthum. Vol. III. The Nematodes of Vertebrates. Systema Helnrinthum. Vol. III. The Nematodes of Vertebrates., Part II, 681–1261. CABI Databases.

 

Zhou, S., Chen, D., Cai, W., Luo, L., Low, M., Tian, F., Tay, V., Ong, D., & Hamilton, B. (2010). Crowd modeling and simulation technologies. ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation (TOMACS), 20(4), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1842722.1842725